dc.contributor.author |
Park, Andrew Erich
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-09-02T21:12:31Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-09-02T21:12:31Z |
|
dc.date.copyright |
2014 |
en_US |
dc.date.issued |
2014-09-02 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1828/5647 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The goal of this thesis is to defend non-representationalist perceptualism about pain against the challenges brought to it by Murat Aydede. These challenges are intended to apply to both a strong version of representationalism and general perceptualism about pain, however I maintain that they are less effective when aimed at the latter. In the interest of pulling apart these two views, I suggest that a more comprehensive theory of introspection than what is currently being used in the debate should be given. This thesis is an attempt to put forward such a view in service of the perceptual theorist. Once an alternative theory of introspection is given, several of the challenges that target perceptualism are avoided. Additionally I argue that the version of representationalism developed by Michael Tye is undermined by his explanation of pain’s negative affect. Consequently, I claim that one need not endorse representationalist commitments in order to maintain the attractive tenets of perceptualism. |
en_US |
dc.language |
English |
eng |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Pain |
en_US |
dc.subject |
perception |
en_US |
dc.subject |
representationalism |
en_US |
dc.subject |
perceptualism |
en_US |
dc.subject |
introspection |
en_US |
dc.subject |
affect |
en_US |
dc.title |
What makes pain unique? : a critique of representationalism about pain in service of perceptualism |
en_US |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en_US |
dc.contributor.supervisor |
Rysiew, Patrick William |
|
dc.degree.department |
Department of Philosophy |
en_US |
dc.degree.level |
Master of Arts M.A. |
en_US |
dc.rights.temp |
Available to the World Wide Web |
en_US |
dc.description.scholarlevel |
Graduate |
en_US |