Responses of fishers to a 25-­year seasonal closed measure on the Andaman Coast of Thailand

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Panjarat, Sampan
dc.contributor.author Bennett, Nathan
dc.date.accessioned 2013-01-31T17:40:15Z
dc.date.available 2013-01-31T17:40:15Z
dc.date.copyright 2012 en_US
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.citation Panjarat, S. & Bennett, N. (2012). Responses of Fishers to a 25-year Seasonal Closed Measure on the Andaman Coast of Thailand. Report prepared for Project IMPAACT and the Marine Protected Areas Research Group, University of Victoria. 21 pages. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1828/4460
dc.description.abstract To address fisheries declines and protect stocks, a Seasonal Closed Measure (SCM) was established in Phang-Nga and Krabi Bays in 1985 and later amended in 2007. Although the SCM has been in place for more than 25 years, its overall effectiveness has been questioned. Generally, fisheries policy decisions in Thailand are made in a top-down fashion by centralized government agencies. The knowledge and opinions of fishers are not taken into account in the creation of policies or the design of management measures. This practice persists despite the fact that attitudes and perceptions of fishers can indicate whether a regulatory instrument is appropriate within a particular social context and can assist with the effective implementation of the measure over the short and longer term. To address this gap, this report presents the results of a study that examined knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of fishers on the SCM. The study examined levels of knowledge, perceptions of impact, satisfaction, behaviors, and opinions regarding the SCM. An individual questionnaire survey of 100 fishers was undertaken during October-November 2010 in Phang Nga, Phuket, Krabi and Trang Provinces, Thailand. The important findings of the study include the following: 1) most fishers had low knowledge on the SCM because of ineffective knowledge mobilization; 2) fishers lacked participation in most management activities because of inappropriate mechanisms for participation; 3) some fishers disagreed with the time and area of the restriction, and some of them opposed the SCM, a few fishers continued to ignore the SCM regulations, 4) fishers were dissatisfied with the performance of patrols and the enforcement of the measure, 5) fishers distrusted patrol officers and did not report violators, 6) fishers distrusted fishers from outside their communities and doubted that they would comply with the SCM, and 7) most fishers were satisfied with the SCM (74%) - however, they felt that it still requires improvement. The following recommendations are made in response to the research findings: 1) the enhancement of the standard knowledge transfer mechanisms especially through social networks and improved participation and involvement, 2) the enhancement of participation requires creation of appropriate and timely processes that incorporate awareness of the social characteristics and the nature of fisheries occupations and the holding of meetings and discussions at the local level preferably via pre-established networks or associations, 3) the re-assessment of various aspects of the SCM including the time and areas of restriction and the exempted fishing gears; the assessment method should integrate the scientific knowledge base and traditional knowledge of fishers and provide for local involvement in order to build trust and commitment, 4) the examination of the capacity and performance of patrol officers in order to ensure effective and equitable enforcement of regulations; further, the building of trust with fishers will enhance information sharing between fishers and patrols, save costs for patrolling, and resolve conflicts. 5) The establishment of appropriate mechanisms to slowdown the race-to-fish that currently occurs after closed season is also recommended. 6) Finally, the provision of capacity building and conservation knowledge, establishment of strict no-take-zones, and creation of incentives for stewardship are also recommended to sustain the SCM and marine resources in Ao Phang-Nga and on the Andaman Sea Coast of Thailand over the long term. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Project IMPAACT, which stands for Improving Marine Protected Areas on the Andaman Coast of Thailand, is a project of the Marine Protected Areas Research Group at the University of Victoria, acknowledges the following sources of funding: the Social Sciences and Human Research Council of Canada, the Trudeau Foundation, and the Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystem project. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Project IMPAACT, Marine Protected Areas Research Group, University of Victoria en_US
dc.title Responses of fishers to a 25-­year seasonal closed measure on the Andaman Coast of Thailand en_US
dc.type Technical Report en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Bennett, Nathan
    Nathan Bennett has worked as a researcher, university instructor, teacher, guide, international development worker, and sustainability-conservation educator.

Show simple item record

Search UVicSpace


My Account