UVicSpace

When Does It (Not) Pay to Be Good? Interplay Between Stakeholder and Competitive Strategies

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author He, Ye
dc.contributor.author Chittoor, Raveendra
dc.date.accessioned 2022-07-07T17:47:39Z
dc.date.available 2022-07-07T17:47:39Z
dc.date.copyright 2022 en_US
dc.date.issued 2022-06-26
dc.identifier.citation He, Y., & Chittoor, R. (2022). When Does It (Not) Pay to Be Good? Interplay Between Stakeholder and Competitive Strategies. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221106433 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221106433
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1828/14021
dc.description We thank Philip Bromiley, Rodolphe Durand, participants at the Strategic Management Society (SMS) 2019 Minneapolis conference, the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada 2019 conference at St. Catharines, and the Stakeholders, Partnerships, and Competitive Advantage workshop at SMS Minneapolis for helpful comments and feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript. We also acknowledge the insightful and constructive comments of the editor Pursey Heugens and the anonymous reviewers. en_US
dc.description.abstract Using the instrumental stakeholder theory lens, we examine how generic competitive strategies influence the link between stakeholder management (SM) and firm financial performance. We develop a framework that highlights the synergistic effects of a differentiation strategy on SM but also the trade-offs between a cost leadership strategy and SM in their consequences for financial performance. We test our theoretical mechanism further by distinguishing between primary and secondary stakeholders, who differ in their degree of firm specificity and instrumentality. We propose that for firms pursuing a low-cost competitive advantage, secondary SM intensifies the trade-offs between SM and financial performance when compared with primary SM, whereas both primary and secondary SM are likely to improve financial performance for differentiators. Empirical analyses using a panel data set of S&P 500 firms over a 15-year period (2005–2019) and a series of robustness tests support our predictions. Our findings highlight important boundary conditions for SM's impact on firms’ financial performance and highlight not only “when SM pays” but also “when SM may not pay.” en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Journal of Management en_US
dc.subject competitive strategies en_US
dc.subject financial performance en_US
dc.subject stakeholder management en_US
dc.subject primary and secondary stakeholders en_US
dc.title When Does It (Not) Pay to Be Good? Interplay Between Stakeholder and Competitive Strategies en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.scholarlevel Faculty en_US
dc.description.reviewstatus Reviewed en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UVicSpace


Browse

My Account

Statistics

Help