dc.contributor.author |
Ortlieb, Paulina Elizabeth
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-02-03T23:41:07Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-12-25T12:22:05Z |
|
dc.date.copyright |
2014 |
en_US |
dc.date.issued |
2015-02-03 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1828/5881 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Punk rock provided not only a watershed of creativity, innovation and a do-it-yourself spirit to a culture saturated in the mainstream, it physically brought like-minded people together in a community, or rather extended family, which in today’s hyper-d.i.y. culture, is progressively declining. As early as the 1940s, theorists such as Adorno and Horkheimer warned us about alienation in a society increasingly dependent on technology. By looking to punk, and other resilient and robust counter-cultures, perhaps we can find solutions to the pitfalls of the ‘culture industry’ (Adorno, Horkheimer, 1944).
My thesis, consisting of a feature-length documentary film and textual analysis, is a culmination of: ethnographic research into the punk scene in my own community; theoretical research into the sociology, ethnography and subculture theory; and my own subjectivity. My personal findings are presented to offer insight into punk philosophy and to spur discourse, rather than deliver an objective account or didactic reproach. |
en_US |
dc.language |
English |
eng |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.subject |
sub-culture |
en_US |
dc.subject |
music |
en_US |
dc.subject |
punk rock |
en_US |
dc.subject |
counter-culture |
en_US |
dc.subject |
digital age |
en_US |
dc.subject |
sociology |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Victoria BC |
en_US |
dc.subject |
local |
en_US |
dc.subject |
ethnography |
en_US |
dc.subject |
documentary |
en_US |
dc.subject |
filmmaking |
en_US |
dc.subject |
film studies |
en_US |
dc.subject |
music sociology |
en_US |
dc.subject |
D.I.Y |
en_US |
dc.subject |
musicology |
en_US |
dc.subject |
grounded theory |
en_US |
dc.subject |
etic |
en_US |
dc.subject |
emic |
en_US |
dc.subject |
qualitative research |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Frankfurt school |
en_US |
dc.subject |
subculture theory |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Adorno |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Horkheimer |
en_US |
dc.subject |
egalitarian |
en_US |
dc.subject |
democracy |
en_US |
dc.subject |
culture |
en_US |
dc.subject |
alienation |
en_US |
dc.subject |
community |
en_US |
dc.subject |
hardcore |
en_US |
dc.subject |
globalism |
en_US |
dc.subject |
internet |
en_US |
dc.subject |
mass culture |
en_US |
dc.subject |
self-identity |
en_US |
dc.subject |
participant observation |
en_US |
dc.subject |
culture industry |
en_US |
dc.subject |
consumerism |
en_US |
dc.subject |
corporatism |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Vancouver Island |
en_US |
dc.subject |
fieldwork |
en_US |
dc.subject |
World Wide Web |
en_US |
dc.subject |
freedom of expression |
en_US |
dc.subject |
rebellion |
en_US |
dc.subject |
technology |
en_US |
dc.subject |
constructivist |
en_US |
dc.subject |
subversion |
en_US |
dc.subject |
CCCS |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Chicago School |
en_US |
dc.subject |
nomeansno |
en_US |
dc.subject |
embodied |
en_US |
dc.subject |
oral history |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Somewhere to Go |
en_US |
dc.title |
The importance of counter-culture in art and life |
en_US |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en_US |
dc.contributor.supervisor |
Bradley, Maureen |
|
dc.contributor.supervisor |
McLarty, Lianne |
|
dc.degree.department |
Interdisciplinary Graduate Program |
en_US |
dc.degree.level |
Master of Arts M.A. |
en_US |
dc.rights.temp |
Available to the World Wide Web |
en_US |
dc.description.scholarlevel |
Graduate |
en_US |