Unarmed and participatory: Palestinian popular struggle and civil resistance theory

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Carpenter, Michael J.
dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-25T20:16:42Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-25T20:16:42Z
dc.date.copyright 2017 en_US
dc.date.issued 2017-04-25
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1828/7986
dc.description.abstract This dissertation advances the literature on civil resistance by proposing an alternative way of thinking about action and organization, and by contributing a new case study of Palestinian struggle in the occupied West Bank. Civil resistance, also known as civil disobedience, nonviolent action, and people power, is about challenging unjust and oppressive regimes through the strategic use of nonviolent methods, including demonstrations, marches, boycotts, strikes, sit-ins, protest camps, and many others (Sharp 2005; Chenoweth and Stephan 2011; Schock 2015). This study employs an approach that minimizes analytical (as well as normative) expectations of perfectly nonviolent forms of struggle (Celikates 2015), and I link this modified pragmatic action model to an organizational principle that has generally been overlooked or discounted in the research literature. On the whole, civil-resistance studies has focused on forms of action to the detriment of exploring forms of organization, or has relegated organization to a subset of action. My research clarifies a participatory approach to organization that is community based, sometimes known as the committee or council system (Arendt 1963). It is radically democratic, yet not necessarily confined to purely horizontal forms of organization. Rather, the model allows, and requires with increasing scale, upward delegation to decision-making and other task-contingent bodies. I argue that without a theoretical framework for apprehending systems of networked and tiered popular governance, Palestinian civil resistance has been insufficiently understood. The dissertation examines Palestinian cases through this framework, linking the conjunction of unarmed action and participatory organization to highpoints of Palestinian struggle. Among the cases is a small civil-society movement in the West Bank that began around 2009 striving to launch a global popular resistance. My research suggests that civil-resistance theorists consider the non-dominative element of organization as they do the non-dominative element of action, that just as violent resistance strategies can counter the logic of people power, so too can centralized organization. This logic does not require that participatory organization be perfectly horizontal any more than civil resistance must be perfectly nonviolent. en_US
dc.language English eng
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.rights Available to the World Wide Web en_US
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ca/ *
dc.subject Civil resistance en_US
dc.subject Palestine en_US
dc.subject Popular struggle en_US
dc.subject People power en_US
dc.subject Unarmed action en_US
dc.subject Participatory organization en_US
dc.subject Popular committee en_US
dc.title Unarmed and participatory: Palestinian popular struggle and civil resistance theory en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.contributor.supervisor Watson, Scott D.
dc.degree.department Department of Political Science en_US
dc.degree.level Doctor of Philosophy Ph.D. en_US
dc.description.scholarlevel Graduate en_US
dc.description.proquestcode 0615 en_US
dc.description.proquestcode 0626 en_US
dc.description.proquestcode 0333 en_US

Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Available to the World Wide Web Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Available to the World Wide Web

Search UVicSpace


My Account