An observed, prospective field study to evaluate the performance and acceptance of a blood-based HIV self-test in Canada

dc.contributor.authorGalli, Richard A.
dc.contributor.authorTian, Jason M. Lo Hog
dc.contributor.authorSumner-Williams, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorMcBain, Kristin
dc.contributor.authorStanizai, Emal
dc.contributor.authorTharao, Wangari
dc.contributor.authorAden, Muna
dc.contributor.authorJamieson, Heather
dc.contributor.authorDa Silva, Mark
dc.contributor.authorVassal, Anne-Fanny
dc.contributor.authorGuilbault, Lorie
dc.contributor.authorIreland, Laurie
dc.contributor.authorWitges, Kim
dc.contributor.authorKing, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorAmetepee, Kehinde
dc.contributor.authorLachowsky, Nathan J.
dc.contributor.authorPai, Nitika Pant
dc.contributor.authorMazzulli, Tony
dc.contributor.authorRourke, Sean B.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-07T22:53:28Z
dc.date.available2022-03-07T22:53:28Z
dc.date.copyright2021en_US
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionThe authors are grateful to all staff of the Hassle Free Clinic, Toronto; Women’s Health in Women’s Hands, Toronto; AIDS Committee of Toronto; Clinique Médicale L’Actuel, Montreal; Nine Circles Community Health Centre, Winnipeg; and especially grateful to the staff who participated as study observers: Jane Greer, Leo Mitterni, Nina Malayil, Danayi Munyati, Elmer Bagares, Lisa Ross, Raul Alvarez, Sanbula Zaidi, Setti Tesfu, Zavare Tengra, John Maxwell, Hella Fesehaye, Denese Frans, Natasha Lawrence, Mary Yehdego, Oludolapo Deborah Balogun, Erin Bechamp.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Self testing for HIV is a targeted intervention with the potential to increase the access, uptake and frequency of HIV testing and more effectively reach the undiagnosed, especially in priority populations. The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate the INSTI HIV self-test performance compared with laboratory reference testing, (2) document if intended users can perform the steps to use the HIV self-test device, and (3) document if intended users can successfully interpret contrived positive, negative, and invalid results. Study was intended to be submitted to Health Canada for review for regulatory approval purposes. Methods: The study used a cross-sectional design and recruited consenting adults who were representative of intended users of HIV self-testing from four community sites across Ontario, Québec, and Manitoba between August 2019 and March 2020. The results of the observed HIV self-test were compared with results of the Abbott Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo test. Usability outcomes for critical (e.g., lancing finger, blood droplet into bottle, shaking bottle four times) and noncritical self-test procedure steps were also determined. Results: Overall, 77% (n = 522) of participants were between 18 and 45 years of age, 61% (n = 410) were male, 71% (n = 480) had some college or more education, and 45% (n = 307) were employed; identity for race and ethnicity: Caucasian (44%; n = 296), African, Caribbean or Black (17%; n = 113), Indigenous [First Nations, Métis or Inuit] (14%; n = 95), Asian (16%; n = 106), Latin American (7%; n = 46). Primary performance analysis on 678 completed HIV self-tests revealed a positive percent agreement of 100% (5/5, 95% CI: 43.6– 97.0%) and a negative percent agreement of 99.5% (614/617, 95% CI: 98.6–99.8%) with the comparator method. The overall percent agreement of results interpretation between participant and observer was 93.5% (n = 633). For the 708 participants who took part in the usability study, the average success rate for steps determined to be “critical” for successful completion of the test was 92.4%. 97% (n = 670) of participants found the instructions easy to follow, and 95% (n = 655) of participants indicated that they would use the test again. Of the 404 participants who interpreted the strong positive, weak positive, negative, and invalid contrived results, successful interpretation ranged from 90.6% (for weak positive, n = 366) to 99.3% (for negative, n = 401). Conclusions: The addition of a regulatory-approved self-test into the Canadian HIV testing landscape could significantly increase HIV testing rates. Having a blood-based HIV self-test approved in Canada can offer an accurate, acceptable, and simple alternative to facility-based HIV testing, particularly when impacted by Coronavirus pandemic restrictions.en_US
dc.description.reviewstatusRevieweden_US
dc.description.scholarlevelFacultyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded by a team grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FRN 164067). NJL was supported by a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Scholar Award (#16863).en_US
dc.identifier.citationGalli, R. A., Tian, J. L. H., Sumner-Williams, M., McBain, K., Stanizai, E., Tharao, W., Aden, M., Jamieson, H., Da Silva, M., Vassal, A., Guilbault, L., Ireland, L., Witges, K., King, A., Ametepee, K., Lachowksy, N. J., Pai, N. P., Mazzulli, T., & Rourke, S. B. (2021). “An observed, prospective field study to evaluate the performance and acceptance of a blood-based HIV self-test in Canada.” BMC Public Health, 21, 1421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11418-zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11418-z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/13777
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMC Public Healthen_US
dc.subjectHIVen_US
dc.subjectBlood-based self-testen_US
dc.subjectAccuracyen_US
dc.subjectUsabilityen_US
dc.subjectAcceptanceen_US
dc.titleAn observed, prospective field study to evaluate the performance and acceptance of a blood-based HIV self-test in Canadaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lachowsky_BMCPublicHealth_2021.pdf
Size:
737.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: