Say ‘Yes!’ to peer review: Open Access publishing and the need for mutual aid in academia

Date

2017

Authors

Springer, Simon
Houssay-Holzschuch, Myriam
Villegas, Claudia
Gahman, Levi

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Fennia

Abstract

Scholars are increasingly declining to offer their services in the peer review process. There are myriad reasons for this refusal, most notably the ever-increasing pressure placed on academics to publish within the neoliberal university. Yet if you are publishing yourself then you necessarily expect someone else to review your work, which begs the question as to why this service is not being reciprocated. There is something to be said about withholding one's labour when journals are under corporate control, but when it comes to Open Access journals such denial is effectively unacceptable. Make time for it, as others have made time for you. As editors of the independent, Open Access, non-corporate journal ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, we reflect on the struggles facing our daily operations, where scholars declining to participate in peer review is the biggest obstacle we face. We argue that peer review should be considered as a form of mutual aid, which is rooted in an ethics of cooperation. The system only works if you say 'Yes!'.

Description

Keywords

critical geographies, mutual aid, neoliberal university, Open Access, peer review, publishing

Citation

Springer, S.; Houssay-Holzschuch, M.; Villegas, C.; & Gahman, L. (2017). Say ‘Yes!’ to peer review: Open Access publishing and the need for mutual aid in academia. Fennia, 192(2), 185-188p. https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.66862