Sommers, Jennifer Heidrun2015-08-282015-08-2820152015-08-28http://hdl.handle.net/1828/6589The philosophical literature on akrasia and/or weakness of the will tends to focus on individual actions, removed from their wider socio-political context. This is problematic because actions, when removed from their wider context, can seem absurd or irrational when they may, in fact, be completely rational or, at least, coherent. Much of akrasia's apparent mystery or absurdity is eliminated when people's behaviours are considered within their cultural and political context. I apply theories from the social and behavioural sciences to a particular behaviour in order to show where the philosophical literature on akrasia and/or weakness of the will is insightful and where it is lacking. The problem used as the basis for my analysis is obesity caused by overeating. On the whole, I conclude that our intuitions about agency are unreliable, that we may have good reasons to overeat and/or neglect our health, and that willpower is, to some degree, a matter of luck.enAvailable to the World Wide Webakrasiaaction theoryaddictionagencyAlison McIntyreapplied ethicsBernard Williamsbody studiesBourdieuCartesian dualismChristine KorsgaardcompulsioncontinencedeviancedietDistinctionDonald DavidsondualismexternalismincontinenceinequalityinternalismintuitionIrving K. ZolaMarxmedicalizationmoralityNichomachean EthicsNomy Arpalyobesity epidemicorthorexiaovereatingoverweightpersonal identityPetr SkrabanekPhilip Kitcherphilosophical intuitionpicoeconomicsPierre Bourdieufatfree willGary WatsonGeorge Ainsliehabitushealthismrat parkrational choicerationalityRichard HoltonRobert Crawfordsocial classstigmataste for luxurytemperanceutility maximizationvirtueweakness of the willwillpowerThesis