Wildcat, Matthew2010-04-302010-04-3020102010-04-30http://hdl.handle.net/1828/2685This thesis explores whether reviving pre-reserve Nehiyaw forms of power represents a strategy of self-determination. To start, an understanding of colonialism is advanced based on the idea that colonialism is an intersectional process that involves both the actions perpetrated from a settler society unto Indigenous peoples, and the legacy of dysfunction that is left with Indigenous peoples as a result of colonization. Second, an understanding of pre-reserve Nehiyaw forms of power is developed, with a focus on how the interaction of legitimacy and authority can be used to explain pre-reserve Nehiyaw forms of power. Finally, I examine if reviving pre-reserve Nehiyaw forms of power represents a strategy of self-determination that addresses the intersectional nature of colonialism. I argue that it does, but in order to revive pre-reserve forms of power we must displace band councils as the site where we imagine a revival of pre-reserve Nehiyaw forms of power.enAvailable to the World Wide WebIndigenous self-determinationcolonialismPowerpre-reserve Nehiyaw societypre-reserve Plains Cree societyband councilsUVic Subject Index::Humanities and Social Sciences::Social SciencesThesis