Assessing Point of Use Water Treatment Technologies under Real-Use Conditions: The Field Challenge Test Technique

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorZimmer, Camille
dc.contributor.supervisorDorea, Caetano
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-28T18:36:11Z
dc.date.available2023-09-28T18:36:11Z
dc.date.copyright2023en_US
dc.date.issued2023-09-28
dc.degree.departmentDepartment of Civil Engineering
dc.degree.levelDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_US
dc.description.abstractPoint of use water treatment (POUWT) technologies can be the final and sometimes only barrier against waterborne illness in contexts where there is insufficient access to a safely managed on-premises water supply. Microbiological effectiveness of POUWT devices is currently evaluated under controlled laboratory conditions using water spiked with virus, bacteria, and/or protozoa or their surrogates to measure log10 reduction values or LRVs, in a process called challenge testing. However, laboratory-based POUWT challenge tests do not adequately assess microbe reduction under real-use conditions, thus omitting variations relative to factors such as user behaviours and water quality. The overall aim of this work was to develop a method with which POUWT technologies can be evaluated under real-use conditions, which we refer to as the field challenge test technique. To this end, we validated the use of probiotic Escherichia coli (E. coli Nissle, EcN) and S. cerevisiae (baker’s yeast) as field-appropriate, food-safe surrogates for pathogenic bacteria and protozoans, respectively. We implemented the innovative field challenge test technique using validated EcN and S. cerevisiae surrogates. In summer 2021, 144 one-on-one surveys were conducted of backcountry campers in the Juan de Fuca provincial park in British Columbia, Canada. The field challenge test consisted of spiking a 1 L sample of water with EcN and S. cerevisiae and requesting participants to treat the spiked water as they normally would, using their own POUWT device. Post-treatment water samples were enumerated in comparison to the original spike to calculate LRVs. Using field challenge testing, we were able to ascertain the performance of POUWT methods under real-use conditions. Our field-based LRVs were generally lower than claimed by POUWT device manufacturers for the bacterial microbe class, but for the protozoan microbe class, LRVs were similar to those claimed by manufacturers. Using the framework of quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA), we quantified and compared health risk estimates when using laboratory-gathered vs field-gathered LRVs of POUWT devices. Health risks attributable to the bacterial pathogen class were higher based on field-gathered LRVs (i.e., obtained by field challenge testing) in comparison to corresponding manufacturer-claimed LRVs.For the protozoan pathogen class, calculated health risks were similar due to homogeneity between field-obtained and manufacturer-claimed LRVs. The field challenge technique and corresponding QMRA analysis have numerous implications, including validation of POUWT sanitary inspection criteria, quantifying health impacts of contextual factors, or to inform technology selection.en_US
dc.description.scholarlevelGraduateen_US
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationZimmer, C. & Dorea, C. C. Differences in laboratory versus field treatment performance of point-of-use drinking water treatment methods: research gaps and ways forward. npj Clean Water 6, 1–7 (2023).en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/15457
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAvailable to the World Wide Weben_US
dc.subjectPoint of use water treatment (POUWT)en_US
dc.subjectquantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA)en_US
dc.subjectmicrobiological challenge testingen_US
dc.subjectdrinking wateren_US
dc.subjectSaccharomyces cerevisiaeen_US
dc.subjectEscherichia colien_US
dc.titleAssessing Point of Use Water Treatment Technologies under Real-Use Conditions: The Field Challenge Test Techniqueen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Zimmer_Camille_PHD_2023.pdf
Size:
8.32 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
PhD dissertation
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETD)
 
University of Victoria Libraries

We acknowledge and respect the Lək̓ʷəŋən (Songhees and Esquimalt) Peoples on whose territory the university stands, and the Lək̓ʷəŋən and W̱SÁNEĆ Peoples whose historical relationships with the land continue to this day.