Sand crab digging: the neuroethology and evolution of a "new" behaviour

dc.contributor.authorFaulkes, Zen
dc.contributor.supervisorPaul, Dorothy H.
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-12T23:49:59Z
dc.date.available2018-07-12T23:49:59Z
dc.date.copyright1996en_US
dc.date.issued2018-07-12
dc.degree.departmentDepartment of Biology
dc.degree.levelDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_US
dc.description.abstractSand crabs (Anomura: Hippoidea) have evolved a "new" means of locomotion: they use their thoracic legs to dig into the sand instead of walking on the benthos as many other decapod crustaceans do. I examined digging by three sand crab species of two families, Blepharipoda occidentalis (Albuneidae), Lepidopa californica (Albuneidae) and Emerita analoga (Hippidae). There are several features common to both sand crab families, suggesting that digging has evolved only once in the sand crabs. The leg tip trajectories are similar, with leg 4 circling in the opposite direction to legs 2 and 3 when viewed from the side; contralateral legs tend to alternate; the "tail" (abdomen in albuneids; uropods in hippids) cycles at higher frequencies than the legs; and the interjoint coordination of a single given leg (e.g., leg 2) is similar in B. occidentalis and E. analoga. There are also features that distinguish the two families. During digging by the albuneids, serially homologous contralateral legs initially alternate, but switch midway through a digging episode to moving synchronously. In E. analoga, the legs 2 and 3 move in bilateral alternation throughout the dig, but the legs 4 can move in bilateral synchrony and a higher frequency than legs 2 and 3 (≈ the uropods' frequency). There are also some similarities between sand crab digging and walking by other decapods, suggesting the two behaviours may be homologous. The coordination of ipsilateral legs on one side of an animal is generally similar in digging and closely related walking species, and there are no obvious differences in the distal leg motor neurons in sand crabs and some walking species. Digging and walking differ in that there are rapid "tail" movements during digging but not walking, and that serially homologous digging legs are more specialised in their motor output than walking legs. The interjoint coordination of legs 2 and 3 resemble backward walking motor patterns by other decapods, whereas that of leg 4 is more similar to forward walking. This suggests that digging is an evolutionary mosaic, comprised of several modified ancestral locomotor behaviours (backward walking in legs 2 and 3, forward walking in leg 4, and tailflipping).en_US
dc.description.scholarlevelGraduateen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/9692
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAvailable to the World Wide Weben_US
dc.subjectHippidaeen_US
dc.subjectHermit crabsen_US
dc.titleSand crab digging: the neuroethology and evolution of a "new" behaviouren_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Faulkes_Zen_PhD_1996.pdf
Size:
5.79 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: