Sex differences in attributional style, self-efficacy and academic achievements in mathematics

dc.contributor.authorLloyd, Jennifer Elizabeth Victoriaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-14T21:07:15Z
dc.date.available2024-08-14T21:07:15Z
dc.date.copyright2002en_US
dc.date.issued2002
dc.degree.departmentDepartment of Educational Psychology and Leadership Studies
dc.degree.levelMaster of Arts M.A.en
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the current study was to provide a further test of the claim that sex differences in mathematics achievement are due to boys' and girls ' differing achievement-related beliefs (Stipek & Gralinksi, 1991). 161 students participated in the study (62 fourth-graders, 99 seventh-graders). Boys' and girls' mathematics report card grades, achievement on the 2001 Foundation Skills Assessment Numeracy subtest, performance attributions, and perceptions of self-efficacy were compared. Results revealed that girls' report card grades were significantly higher than those of boys, whereas boys' and girls' achievement on the 2001 Foundation Skills Assessment did not differ significantly. While results show relative gains for girls in attributional thinking, girls were significantly more apt to display underconfidence relative to their actual mathematics achievement and to attribute mathematics failure to a lack of teachers' help than were boys. Suggestions for future research are presented.
dc.format.extent120 pages
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1828/18718
dc.rightsAvailable to the World Wide Weben_US
dc.titleSex differences in attributional style, self-efficacy and academic achievements in mathematicsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LLOYD_Jennifer_Elizabeth_Victroria_MA_2002_1218629.pdf
Size:
2.79 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format