Leading with Indigenous Principles: Ecological Watershed Governance in British Columbia, Canada

dc.contributor.authorBall, Murray
dc.contributor.supervisorCurran, Deborah
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-16T17:43:59Z
dc.date.available2023-11-16T17:43:59Z
dc.date.copyright2023en_US
dc.date.issued2023-11-16
dc.degree.departmentSchool of Environmental Studiesen_US
dc.degree.levelDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_US
dc.description.abstractBoth Indigenous and state governments grapple with drivers of ecological decline in colonial states. Ecological drivers such as resource extraction and climate warming meet in the realm of shared land and water governance. Shared governance at the watershed scale must face the challenge of bridging the governance approaches of nation states and Indigenous peoples with distinct legal and governance traditions. I approach that challenge with a case study of the Cowichan Watershed in British Columbia, Canada. I draw on 12 years of shared Indigenous and regional (state) governance experience at the watershed scale. I ask what the Cowichan experience reveals about how a Provincial level state government can enable the full expression of Indigenous governance principles in ecological watershed governance. I adopt a research framework of watershed governance functions and Hul’qumi’num governance principles to investigate how governance works in practice, the influence of Indigenous governance principles, and the roles of government in enabling and impeding those principles. I find that Hul’qumi’num principles are the key driver of success in setting aspirational targets for ecological conditions of the Watershed, in improving decision-making affecting watershed ecology, and in aligning responsibility with authority. The governance of river flow improved greatly over the study period, but the governance of forestry, where there was no opportunity to apply Hul’qumi’num principles, did not. The well-being of salmon improved greatly over the study period, but the well-being of the forest, as measured by old growth retention and recruitment, did not. The contrasts bear witness to the influence of Hul’qumi’num governance principles and to the essential role of Cowichan Tribes leadership. Cowichan Tribes led ecological governance initiatives by applying the principles in accordance with the Hul’qumi’num legal tradition, and by teaching others how to apply the principles. The implications for the Province of British Columbia are that it must change its legislation respecting land and water management, particularly with respect to forestry on large private land holdings, and it must co-create and fund watershed-scale governance entities with Indigenous peoples to enable the application and reap the benefits of Indigenous governance principles.en_US
dc.description.scholarlevelGraduateen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/15627
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAvailable to the World Wide Weben_US
dc.subjectEcological Governanceen_US
dc.subjectWatershed Governanceen_US
dc.subjectIndigenous Governance Principlesen_US
dc.subjectHul'qumi'num Governance Traditionen_US
dc.titleLeading with Indigenous Principles: Ecological Watershed Governance in British Columbia, Canadaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ball_Murray_PhD_2023.pdf
Size:
1.81 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
PhD Dissertation
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: