Impact of Manikin Display on Perception of Spatial Planning

dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, Mathew
dc.contributor.authorHaworth, Brandon
dc.contributor.authorUsman, Muhammad
dc.contributor.authorFaloutsos, Petros
dc.contributor.authorKapadia, Mubbasir
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-28T16:02:40Z
dc.date.available2023-05-28T16:02:40Z
dc.date.copyright2022en_US
dc.date.issued2022-09-22
dc.description.abstractThe visualization of spaces, both virtual and built, has long been an important part of the environment design process. Industry tools to visualize occupancy have grown from simple drop-in stock photos post-design to real-time crowds simulations. However, while treatment of visualization and collaborative design processes has long been discussed in the HCI and Architecture communities, these inclusive design methods are infrequently seen in architecture education (e.g. studio) and practice, nor implemented in licensure requirements – leaving designers to think about the future occupants on their own. While there are strong indicators of the impact visualization modality and rendering style have on perception of scale and space, little has been explored regarding how we represent the human form with respect to these design tools and practices. We present findings from a novel online interactive space planning and estimation study that examines the effects of 3 common building visualization modalities in the design process with 3 human form modalities extracted from the architecture literature. Results indicate the type of visualization changes the number of occupants estimated, and that designers prefer integrated manikins within building models when estimating space usage, although their acceptance was equally divided between 2D and 3D. Our findings lay the foundation for new and focused design tools integrating human form and factors at building scale.en_US
dc.description.reviewstatusRevieweden_US
dc.description.scholarlevelFacultyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors thank Okhyun Des lauriers for assistance in the environment modeling. We also thank Serena DeStefani for consulting on our data analysis. The research was supported in part by NSERC Discovery, Canada [funding reference number RGPIN-2021-03541] and in part by NSF awards: IIS-1703883, IIS-1955404, IIS-1955365, RETTL-2119265, and EAGER-2122119. This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security un-der Grant Award Number 22STESE00001 01 01." Disclaimer. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.”en_US
dc.identifier.citationSchwartz, M., Haworth, B., Usman, M., Faloutsos, P., & Kapadia, M. (2022). Impact of Manikin Display on Perception of Spatial Planning. ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2022. https://doi.org/10.1145/3548814.3551457en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1145/3548814.3551457
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/15140
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherACM Digital Libraryen_US
dc.subjecthuman factorsen_US
dc.subjectarchitectural designen_US
dc.subjectvisualizationen_US
dc.titleImpact of Manikin Display on Perception of Spatial Planningen_US
dc.typePostprinten_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Haworth_ACM_SAP_2022.pdf
Size:
5.39 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: