What Human-Centered Design Can Tell Us About the State of Dispute Systems Design
dc.contributor.author | Miller, Alyson | |
dc.contributor.supervisor | Ney, Tara | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-16T06:32:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-16T06:32:01Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019 | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2019-05-15 | |
dc.degree.department | School of Public Administration | en_US |
dc.degree.level | Master of Arts M.A. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | There is a growing recognition that public sector complaint systems do not yield results that are satisfactory for citizens and users. Often complaints are underreported, misrepresented or involve harmful reporting processes. A body of work called Dispute System Design (DSD) evolved to create a systematic approach to designing dispute resolution systems. A genealogical analysis of this literature provides insight into why these complaint systems fail. This paper aims to explore how DSD models and frameworks may be aligned with human-centered design principles to ensure they meet user needs. | en_US |
dc.description.scholarlevel | Graduate | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1828/10882 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.rights | Available to the World Wide Web | en_US |
dc.subject | Human-Centered Design | en_US |
dc.subject | Dispute System Design | en_US |
dc.subject | Design Thinking | en_US |
dc.subject | Complaint System | en_US |
dc.title | What Human-Centered Design Can Tell Us About the State of Dispute Systems Design | en_US |
dc.type | project | en_US |