"We are here, we are here, we are here, we are here" : subjectivity and the animal question

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorLutjen, Larissa Angelinaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-14T21:07:39Z
dc.date.available2024-08-14T21:07:39Z
dc.date.copyright2001en_US
dc.date.issued2001
dc.degree.departmentDepartment of Political Science
dc.degree.levelMaster of Arts M.A.en
dc.description.abstractThis paper argues that there are three valid approaches to the problem of human (ab)uses of non-human animals. The rights/equality, ecofeminist and poststructural arguments each problematize the traditional division between human and non-human animals, although at times these approaches criticize and supplement each other. In particular, each perspective addresses the question of animal subjectivity in different and interesting ways. Together they suggest potentially innovative strategies that activists and concerned people alike can use in the effort to address the oppression of animals.
dc.format.extent128 pages
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1828/18746
dc.rightsAvailable to the World Wide Weben_US
dc.title"We are here, we are here, we are here, we are here" : subjectivity and the animal questionen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LUTJEN_Larissa_Angelina_MA_2001_1207441.pdf
Size:
44.86 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETD)
 
University of Victoria Libraries

We acknowledge and respect the Lək̓ʷəŋən (Songhees and Esquimalt) Peoples on whose territory the university stands, and the Lək̓ʷəŋən and W̱SÁNEĆ Peoples whose historical relationships with the land continue to this day.