Amount of study time as a factor in meaningful and rote retention.

dc.contributor.authorThomson, Mary Leeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-15T20:09:19Z
dc.date.available2024-08-15T20:09:19Z
dc.date.copyright1968en_US
dc.date.issued1968
dc.degree.departmentFaculty of Education
dc.degree.departmentDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction
dc.degree.levelMaster of Arts M.A.en
dc.description.abstractThis study attempted to investigate the position taken by Ausubel with regard to meaningful and rota retention by determining the extent to which amount of study time influ­enced retention of meaningful and rote materials. Replica­tion of part of a study by Ausubel and Fitzgerald was also attempted. Subjects were 114 university undergraduates. Meaningful and rote materials designed by Ausubel and Fitzgerald were studied for a long or short time. Reten­tion was tested immediately and one week later with a mul­tiple-choice instrument. Data were treated with a 2 x 2 x 2 analysis of variance and a series of planned comparisons. It was found that amount of study time and time of testing were influential variable in this study. No differences in retention attributable to type of materials (meaningful or rote) were found. It was concluded that the findings did not support Ausubel's theoretical position.en
dc.format.extent71 pages
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1828/19903
dc.rightsAvailable to the World Wide Weben_US
dc.titleAmount of study time as a factor in meaningful and rote retention.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
THOMSON_Mary_Lee_MA_1969_305234.pdf
Size:
16.8 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format