Evaluation and comparison of CanRCM4 and CRCM5 to estimate probable maximum precipitation over North America

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBen Alaya, Mohamed A.
dc.contributor.authorZwiers, Francis W.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xuebin
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-10T20:27:27Z
dc.date.available2025-04-10T20:27:27Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractRecently dam managers have begun to use data produced by regional climate models to estimate how probable maximum precipitation (PMP) might evolve in the future. Before accomplishing such a task, it is essential to assess PMP estimates derived from regional climate models (RCMs). In the current study PMP over North America estimated from two Canadian RCMs, CanRCM4 and CRCM5, is compared with estimates derived from three reanalysis products: ERA-Interim, NARR, and CFSR. An additional hybrid dataset (MSWEP-ERA) produced by combining precipitation from the Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation (MSWEP) dataset and precipitable water (PW) from ERA-Interim is also considered to derive PMP estimates that can serve as a reference. A recently developed approach using a statistical bivariate extreme values distribution is used to provide a probabilistic description of the PMP estimates using the moisture maximization method. Such a probabilistic description naturally allows an assessment of PMP estimates that includes quantification of their uncertainty. While PMP estimates based on the two RCMs exhibit spatial patterns similar to those of MSWEP-ERA and the three sets of reanalyses on the continental scale over North America, CanRCM4 has a tendency for overestimation while CRCM5 has a tendency for modest underestimation. Generally, CRCM5 shows good agreement with ERA-Interim, while CanRCM4 is more comparable to CFSR. Overall, the good ability of the two RCMs to reproduce the major characteristics of the different components involved in the estimation of PMP suggests that they may be useful tools for PMP estimation that could serve as a basis for flood studies at the basin scale.
dc.description.reviewstatusReviewed
dc.description.scholarlevelFaculty
dc.identifier.citationBen Alaya, M. A., Zwiers, F. W., & Zhang, X. (2019). Evaluation and comparison of CanRCM4 and CRCM5 to estimate probable maximum precipitation over North America. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 20(10), 2069–2089. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-18-0233
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/110.1175/JHM-D-18-0233.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1828/21797
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJournal of Hydrometeorology
dc.subjectUN SDG 13: Climate Action
dc.subject#journal article
dc.subjectPacific Climate Impacts Consortium (PCIC)
dc.titleEvaluation and comparison of CanRCM4 and CRCM5 to estimate probable maximum precipitation over North America
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
benalaya_ma_JHydrometeorol_2019.pdf
Size:
5.89 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

PCIC Publications
 
University of Victoria Libraries

We acknowledge and respect the Lək̓ʷəŋən (Songhees and Esquimalt) Peoples on whose territory the university stands, and the Lək̓ʷəŋən and W̱SÁNEĆ Peoples whose historical relationships with the land continue to this day.