Governing Madness: Coercion, Resistence and Agency in British Columbia's Mental Health Law Regime

dc.contributor.authorFraser, Gene
dc.contributor.supervisorDeckha, Maneesha
dc.contributor.supervisorMoss, Pamela
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-23T20:42:59Z
dc.date.copyright2015en_US
dc.date.issued2015-04-23
dc.degree.departmentFaculty of Law
dc.degree.levelDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_US
dc.description.abstractAmong the features that distinguish British Columbia’s mental health laws from those in other provinces in Canada is that they accord a high level of discretion to psychiatrists to impose involuntary treatment on patients who have the mental capacity to withhold consent to this treatment. In this research I examine the nature of the medico-legal regime in British Columbia that permits this coercive treatment, describe how it came into existence, and explore how it works in the lives of specific patients. Michel Foucault’s philosophy informs the historical, theoretical, and empirical dimensions of this research and provides a framework for a normative critique of British Columbia’s mental health law regime. In establishing the background to British Columbia’s current mental health laws, I give a historical account of the social forces that produced this province’s laws, which reflect a strong orientation toward neurobiological psychiatric ways of understanding and treating people diagnosed as having mental disorders. Foucault’s writings on governmentality, discourse and human agency provide the theoretical basis in this research for understanding the operation of psychiatric power in British Columbia. These writings also inform the methodology for the analysis of institutional discourse, which I use in the empirical component of this research. In order to conduct an empirical investigation of this British Columbia’s current mental health law regime, I gathered data from transcripts of three administrative tribunal hearings before the Mental Health Review Board of British Columbia and two other decisions from hearings before that board for which transcripts were not available. In these hearings, patients who had been subjected to involuntary psychiatric treatment orders under mental health legislation sought release from detention by challenging the psychiatrists who had issued the orders. The Review Board is legislatively empowered to affirm these orders or discharge the patients from involuntary psychiatric treatment. I use critical discourse analysis to analyze discursive exchanges between patients, psychiatrists and other participants at the hearings, exchanges that disclose power relations between the participants and have significant effects in shaping the outcomes for the patients. My critical discourse analysis of the transcript data and Review Board decisions discloses discriminatory and prejudicial psychiatric practices shaped by British Columbia’s mental health laws. This research lays the groundwork for a normative framework, based on Foucault’s writings on ethics and relational agency, for understanding patients’ rights to consensual medical treatment that overcomes problems associated with traditional liberal conceptions of individual rights and is a philosophically coherent basis for making recommendations to change British Columbia’s mental health law regime.en_US
dc.description.scholarlevelGraduateen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/5996
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAvailable to the World Wide Weben_US
dc.subjectBritish Columbiaen_US
dc.subjectMental Health Lawen_US
dc.subjectDiscourse Analysisen_US
dc.subjectGovernmentalityen_US
dc.subjectCharter of Rightsen_US
dc.subjectFoucaulten_US
dc.titleGoverning Madness: Coercion, Resistence and Agency in British Columbia's Mental Health Law Regimeen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Fraser_Gene_PhD_2015.pdf
Size:
4.96 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Updated October 2017
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.74 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: