Attentional styles in rugby players

dc.contributor.authorMaynard, Ian W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-14T22:44:12Z
dc.date.available2024-08-14T22:44:12Z
dc.date.copyright1986en_US
dc.date.issued1986
dc.degree.departmentSchool of Physical Education
dc.degree.departmentSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education
dc.degree.levelMaster of Arts M.A.en
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between Nidef­fer's Test of Attentional and Interpersonal Style (T AIS) and success in the game of rugby, level of experience and position played within the sport. One hundred and forty-four male volunteer rugby players from the Vancouver Island Rugby Union were administered the attentional subscales of the T AIS. The sample included 72 high ability players and 72 of average ability. Within each ability group subjects were further classified by age: Under 19 (U .19) years of age (n=24), Under 23 (U .23) years of age (n=24) and Senior (n=24). Four specific posi­tional groups were identified within the sample: Tight Five (n=56), Back Row (n=24), Half Backs (n=20) and Threequarters (n=44). A series of Two-way multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVAS) were per­formed on the data. No significant differences were observed between the two ability groups. These results replicate the findings of Van Schoyck and Grasha (1981) and Vallerand (1983). A significant difference was revealed when level of experience was considered (F=l.80, p<.05). The senior group was found to differ from both the U.19 and U.23 groups. Consistent with the observations of Richards and Landers (1979) and McKenna (1982), it was concluded that attentional differ­ences exist between experienced and less experienced rugby players. Significant differences were observed between the Half Backs and the remaining positional groups, on two of the six attentional subscales (F=l.78, p<.05). It was noted, that the Half Back group reflected most closely Nideffer's concept of an effective attentional style. The study also produced additional support for the position of Etzel (1979), Van Schoyck and Grasha (1981) and Vallerand ( 198 3 ), that attentional demands may be more complex than Nideffer's theory indicates. It was recommended that future research should focus on the underlying dimensionality of attention, and that sports- specific measures may be more precise indicators of attentional style in athletes, than is the present general TAIS test.
dc.format.extent78 pages
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1828/18888
dc.rightsAvailable to the World Wide Weben_US
dc.titleAttentional styles in rugby playersen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Maynard_IanW_MA_1986_57238.pdf
Size:
16.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format