Attribution causes and dimensions of university undergraduate students to performance outcome

dc.contributor.authorDryden, Elizabeth Loween_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-13T20:18:49Z
dc.date.available2024-08-13T20:18:49Z
dc.date.copyright1989en_US
dc.date.issued1989
dc.degree.departmentDepartment of Psychological Foundations in Education
dc.degree.departmentDepartment of Educational Psychology and Leadership Studies
dc.degree.levelMaster of Arts M.A.en
dc.description.abstractThis study was conducted to determine if there were any significant differences between upper and lower level university undergraduate students (N=l44) in causal attributions and dimensions to performance outcomes. No significant differences were found between upper (n=99) and lower level (n=45) students and causal attributions or dimensions. However, modest differences were noted in the extent to which students indicated the causes influenced their outcome on a nine-point scale. In accordance with the attribution literature, significant differences were found between performance outcome and causal attributions and dimensions. Results were discussed in relation to the attribution literature. The percentage of unsuccessful students who attributed their outcome primarily to ability was noted, and related to the research literature dealing with attribution intervention programs. The results of this study are limited to undergraduate students attending summer session at the University of Victoria.
dc.format.extent65 pages
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1828/17653
dc.rightsAvailable to the World Wide Weben_US
dc.titleAttribution causes and dimensions of university undergraduate students to performance outcomeen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DRYDEN_Elizabeth_Lowe_MA_1989_503691.pdf
Size:
16.39 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format