Inclusivity of Indigenous Knowledge Systems in fisheries management
| dc.contributor.author | Moffat, Keshia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Snook, Jamie | |
| dc.contributor.author | Paul, Kenneth | |
| dc.contributor.author | Frid, Alejandro | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-17T18:40:39Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-06-17T18:40:39Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Indigenous Peoples have developed knowledge systems that foster respectful and reciprocal relations between humans and other-than-human beings, supporting resilient ecosystems and societies. Despite the impacts of colonisation, Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) endure in many parts of the world, and there is growing recognition that IKS can strongly improve fisheries management. During the last 5 years, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), the federal institution responsible for managing Canada's fisheries, released policies and strategies intended to make fisheries management more inclusive of IKS. To measure progress in their implementation, we applied 13 semiquantitative indicators and qualitative analyses of IKS inclusivity to a sample of 78 public documents produced or co-produced by DFO to advise management decisions. Of these documents, ≈87% reported cases that did not meaningfully include Indigenous Peoples and their IKS, 9.0% reported cases in which Indigenous Peoples were included in some aspects of research but their IKS was not, ≈3% reported cases in which IKS contributed to objectives and elements of research design but the process privileged Western science over IKS, and only one document met a high standard for the pairing of IKS and Western science. The indicators that we developed in a Canadian context can be used, with locally appropriate revisions, to gauge the extent to which state governments in other countries are inclusive of IKS in fisheries management, thereby identifying shortcomings in law, policy, and practice and informing mitigation measures. Strengthening the inclusivity of IKS would enable more holistic approaches to fisheries management and benefit global conservation. | |
| dc.description.reviewstatus | Reviewed | |
| dc.description.scholarlevel | Faculty | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by The Ocean Foundation, The Pew Charitable Trusts, and Oceana Canada. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Moffat, K., Snook, J., Paul, K., & Frid, A. (2025). Inclusivity of Indigenous knowledge systems in fisheries management. Fish and Fisheries, 26(4), 669–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12905 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12905 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1828/22393 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Fish and Fisheries | |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | co-governance | |
| dc.subject | collaborative fisheries | |
| dc.subject | cultural continuity | |
| dc.subject | ecosystem approach | |
| dc.subject | indicators of indigenous inclusivity | |
| dc.subject | knowledge co-production | |
| dc.title | Inclusivity of Indigenous Knowledge Systems in fisheries management | |
| dc.type | Article |