Community engagement as conflict prevention: understanding the social license to operate
| dc.contributor.author | Knih, Dejana | |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | Davis, Lyn | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-12-06T23:24:27Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-12-06T23:24:27Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2012 | en_US |
| dc.date.issued | 2012-12-06 | |
| dc.degree.department | Program: Dispute Resolution | en_US |
| dc.degree.level | Master of Arts M.A. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis examines community engagement as a form of conflict prevention in order to obtain the social license to operate (SLO) in Alberta’s oil and gas industry. It does this by answering the question: what are the key elements of the Social License to Operate and how can these elements be applied to community engagement/consultation in a way that prevents conflicts in Alberta’s oil and gas industry? The underlying assumption of this thesis is that building good relationships and working collaboratively functions as a form of conflict prevention and that this in turn leads to the SLO. This thesis outlines the key features of both successful community engagement and of the SLO, to provide a guideline for what is needed to obtain the SLO. Data was collected from semi-structured interviews and through a literature review. The data analysis concluded that there are direct parallels between the key elements of effective community engagement and the key elements of the SLO as identified in the interviews. These parallels are: knowing the community, addressing community needs, corporate social responsibility, relationship building, follow through and evidence for what has been done, executive buy-in, excellent communication, and open dialogue, all within a process which is principled (there is trust, understanding, transparency and respect), inclusive, dynamic, flexible, ongoing, and long-term. Moreover, the key elements of effective community engagement and of the SLO identified in the interviews also overlapped with those found in the literature review, with only one exception. The literature review explicitly named early involvement as a key element of both effective community engagement and the SLO, whereas the interview participants only explicitly indicated it as a key factor of community engagement and implied it to be a key element of the SLO. | en_US |
| dc.description.scholarlevel | Graduate | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1828/4338 | |
| dc.language | English | eng |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.rights.temp | Available to the World Wide Web | en_US |
| dc.subject | Community Engagement | en_US |
| dc.subject | Social License to Operate | en_US |
| dc.subject | Oil and Gas | en_US |
| dc.subject | Alberta | en_US |
| dc.subject | Canada | en_US |
| dc.subject | Conflict Management | en_US |
| dc.subject | Conflict Prevention | en_US |
| dc.subject | Alternative Dispute Resolution | en_US |
| dc.subject | Dispute Resolution | en_US |
| dc.title | Community engagement as conflict prevention: understanding the social license to operate | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |