Peer Support Groups For Substance Misuse: Understanding Engagement With the Group

dc.contributor.authorSotskova, Alina
dc.contributor.supervisorWoodin, Erica M.
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-25T22:25:18Z
dc.date.copyright2014en_US
dc.date.issued2014-08-25
dc.degree.departmentDepartment of Psychologyen_US
dc.degree.levelDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_US
dc.description.abstractPeer support groups (PSGs) for addiction recovery are the most common source for aftercare services once professional treatment has ended (Cloud, Rowan, Wulff, & Golder, 2007), and a significant number of individuals who seek help for a substance-related problem only seek that help from peer support organizations, such as Alcoholics Anonymous (White, 2010). In the last two decades, a different, more secular culture of “recovery” from self-defined problematic substance has led to the emergence of new PSGs (White, 2009). However, very few research studies to date have examined how more recent, typically secular, PSGs work, what aspects of them attract participants, and what participants find helpful about the group. Further, very little is known whether theories that have been applied to clinical treatment, such as the Stages of Change model, relate to the peer support environment. LifeRing is a secular PSG that views substance misuse as a learned habit that can be changed through taking responsibility for one’s actions and actively engaging with peers (Nicolaus, 2009). A particularly relevant model to LifeRing is Stages of Change, because LifeRing encourages personal responsibility and choice, does not prescribe any specific steps, and encourages individuals to build their own recovery plan that can help them stay motivated in recovery (Nicolaus, 2009). The current study examined data from 50 participants that attend LifeRing meetings on Vancouver Island. The results were not consistent with the Stages of Change framework. 4 Specifically, readiness to change and active group participation did not predict group engagement outcomes. Analysis of open-ended follow-up questions indicate that group cohesion and match in beliefs were significantly associated with greater active group participation and convenor alliance was significantly associated with group satisfaction, paralleling findings on the topic in the psychotherapy literature. Information from qualitative follow-up questions regarding helpful and unhelpful aspects of LifeRing are also discussed.en_US
dc.description.proquestemailavsotskova@gmail.comen_US
dc.description.scholarlevelGraduateen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/5595
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights.tempAvailable to the World Wide Weben_US
dc.subjectaddictionen_US
dc.subjectsubstance misuseen_US
dc.subjectsubstance abuseen_US
dc.subjectsubstance use disorderen_US
dc.subjectrecovery movementen_US
dc.subjectpeer support groupsen_US
dc.subjectLifeRingen_US
dc.subjectmutual aid groupsen_US
dc.subjectsocial supporten_US
dc.subjectcohesionen_US
dc.subjecttherapeutic allianceen_US
dc.subjectgroup dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectcontemplation ladderen_US
dc.subjectstages of changeen_US
dc.subjectgroup satisfactionen_US
dc.subjectgroup engagementen_US
dc.subjectmotivationen_US
dc.titlePeer Support Groups For Substance Misuse: Understanding Engagement With the Groupen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sotskova_Alina_PHD_2014.pdf
Size:
1.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.74 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: