A Comparative Study on Recently-Introduced Nature-Based Global Optimization Methods in Complex Mechanical System Design

dc.contributor.authorSaad, Abdulbaset El Hadi
dc.contributor.authorDong, Zuomin
dc.contributor.authorKarimi, Meysam
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-02T08:21:07Z
dc.date.available2018-11-02T08:21:07Z
dc.date.copyright2017en_US
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractAdvanced global optimization algorithms have been continuously introduced and improved to solve various complex design optimization problems for which the objective and constraint functions can only be evaluated through computation intensive numerical analyses or simulations with a large number of design variables. The often implicit, multimodal, and ill-shaped objective and constraint functions in high-dimensional and “black-box” forms demand the search to be carried out using low number of function evaluations with high search efficiency and good robustness. This work investigates the performance of six recently introduced, nature-inspired global optimization methods: Artificial Bee Colony (ABC), Firefly Algorithm (FFA), Cuckoo Search (CS), Bat Algorithm (BA), Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). These approaches are compared in terms of search efficiency and robustness in solving a set of representative benchmark problems in smooth-unimodal, non-smooth unimodal, smooth multimodal, and non-smooth multimodal function forms. In addition, four classic engineering optimization examples and a real-life complex mechanical system design optimization problem, floating offshore wind turbines design optimization, are used as additional test cases representing computationally-expensive black-box global optimization problems. Results from this comparative study show that the ability of these global optimization methods to obtain a good solution diminishes as the dimension of the problem, or number of design variables increases. Although none of these methods is universally capable, the study finds that GWO and ABC are more efficient on average than the other four in obtaining high quality solutions efficiently and consistently, solving 86% and 80% of the tested benchmark problems, respectively. The research contributes to future improvements of global optimization methods.en_US
dc.description.reviewstatusRevieweden_US
dc.description.scholarlevelFacultyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFinancial supports fromthe Fellowship funds of the LibyanMinistry of Education, the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and University of Victoria are gratefully acknowledged.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSaad, A., Dong, Z. & Karimi, M. (2017) A Comparative Study on Recently- Introduced Nature-Based Global Optimization Methods in Complex Mechanical System Design. Algorithms, 10(4), 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/a10040120en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/a10040120
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/10236
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAlgorithmsen_US
dc.subjectnature based optimizationen_US
dc.subjectartificial bee colonyen_US
dc.subjectfirefly algorithmen_US
dc.subjectcuckoo searchen_US
dc.subjectbat algorithmen_US
dc.subjectflower polination algorithmen_US
dc.subjectgrey wolf optimizeren_US
dc.titleA Comparative Study on Recently-Introduced Nature-Based Global Optimization Methods in Complex Mechanical System Designen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Saad_A_Algorithms_2017.pdf
Size:
2.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: