Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy policy tools in western Canada

dc.contributor.authorMasai, Salim Musa
dc.contributor.supervisorSpeers, Kimberly of Public Administrationen_US of Public Administration M.P.A.en_US
dc.description.abstractCanada’s four western provinces largely converged in implementing Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake policy tools. This thesis analyzes these tools and focuses on vaccine mandates, vaccine passports, and related policy tools. The method applied was data analysis, and two frameworks, a policy tool framework and a vaccine hesitancy framework, were applied. Using these, information was interpreted from two sources of grey literature, government websites and news media articles published from late 2020 to early 2022. All four western provincial governments were found to substantially adopt agreed upon recommendations from scholars in the fields of public health, public health communication, and vaccination. Manitoba was most successful in adopting these measures, followed by Saskatchewan, but counter to expert recommendations, Alberta implemented extensive financial inducements to improve vaccination uptake. While BC obtained the highest vaccination rates, it was the only province of the four that did not provide an option of testing in lieu of vaccination, a decision by the Minister of Health. This was the case for employees in its public service agency, its healthcare sector, or for residents in general regarding its vaccine passport. Vaccine passports and vaccine mandates raised concerns about informed consent. This exhibited a clash between principles of governance involving the legitimate use of coercion, and how informed consent in medicine requires the absence of coercion. This thesis argues that, in some cases, these actions violated the Charter protected right to bodily integrity. These concerns implied one of two requirements regarding vaccine passports and vaccine mandates: either a clear expression of specific risks proportional to their coercive force as justification, which was not forthcoming; or mitigation of their coercive force, which testing in lieu accomplished. Therefore, three of the western provinces substantially met the ethical requirements implied by their vaccine passports and vaccine mandates by implementing the mitigating option of testing in lieu. Yet based on the criteria as established in this thesis, BC did not meet these ethical requirements.en_US
dc.rightsAvailable to the World Wide Weben_US
dc.subjectvaccine hesitancyen_US
dc.subjectpolicy toolsen_US
dc.subjectCovid-19 vaccineen_US
dc.subjectvaccine passporten_US
dc.subjectvaccine mandateen_US
dc.subjectinformed consenten_US
dc.subjectwestern Canadaen_US
dc.titleCovid-19 vaccine hesitancy policy tools in western Canadaen_US


Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
1.87 MB
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
2 KB
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission