"Look at what I am saying": multimodal science teaching.
| dc.contributor.author | Pozzer-Ardenghi, Lilian | |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | Roth, Wolff-Michael | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2007-08-30T18:42:44Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2007-08-30T18:42:44Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2007 | en_US |
| dc.date.issued | 2007-08-30T18:42:44Z | |
| dc.degree.department | Department of Curriculum and Instruction | |
| dc.degree.level | Doctor of Philosophy Ph.D. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Language constitutes the dominant representational mode in science teaching, and lectures are still the most prevalent of the teaching methods in school science. In this dissertation, I investigate lectures from a multimodal and communicative perspective to better understand how teaching as a cultural-historical and social activity unfolds; that is, I am concerned with teaching as a communicative event, where a variety of signs (or semiotic resources), expressed in diverse modalities (or modes of communication) are produced and reproduced while the teacher articulates very specific conceptual meanings for the students. Within a trans-disciplinary approach that merges theoretical and methodical frameworks of social and cultural studies of human activity and interaction, communicative and gestures studies, linguistics, semiotics, pragmatics, and studies on teaching and learning science, I investigate teaching as a communicative, dynamic, multimodal, and social activity. My research questions include: What are the resources produced and reproduced in the classroom when the teacher is lecturing? How do these resources interact with each other? What meanings do they carry and how are these associated to achieve the coherence necessary to accomplish the communication of complex and abstract scientific concepts, not only within one lecture, but also within an entire unit of the curricula encompassing various lectures? My results show that, when lecturing, the communication of scientific concepts occur along trajectories driven by the dialectical relation among the various semiotic resources a lecturer makes available that together constitute a unit—the idea. Speech, gestures, and other nonverbal resources are but one-sided expressions of a higher order communicative meaning unit. The iterable nature of the signs produced and reproduced during science lectures permits, supports, and encourages the repetition, variation, and translation of ideas, themes, and languages and therefore permits, supports, and encourages conceptual development at the boundary between the mundane and discipline-specific cultures that students (have to) traverse in learning. It is only within this multimodal and dialectical communicative meaning unit that we can understand and investigate science teaching and learning as these processes naturally occur. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1828/212 | |
| dc.language | English | eng |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.rights | Available to the World Wide Web | en_US |
| dc.subject | Multimodality | en_US |
| dc.subject | Communication | en_US |
| dc.subject | Teaching | en_US |
| dc.subject | Lectures | en_US |
| dc.subject | Gestures | en_US |
| dc.subject | Microanalysis | en_US |
| dc.subject | Semiotics | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | UVic Subject Index::Humanities and Social Sciences::Education::Science--Study and teaching | en_US |
| dc.title | "Look at what I am saying": multimodal science teaching. | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |