Deception and impersonation in the Robin Hood tradition : a comparison of medieval and nineteenth-century approaches
| dc.contributor.author | Aykroyd, Lucas Mikael Darche | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-12T19:31:21Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-12T19:31:21Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 1997 | en_US |
| dc.date.issued | 1997 | |
| dc.degree.department | Department of English | |
| dc.degree.level | Master of Arts M.A. | en |
| dc.description.abstract | However, medieval and nineteenth-century approaches to these themes are different. In medieval English ballads, trickery by the outlaw hero and his supporters embodies a subversive attitude toward hierarchical authority, depicted as corrupt and unjust to gratify a plebeian yeoman audience. Acts of deception furnish anti-authoritarian commentary on political, economic, and religious issues. But from 1500 to 1800, a change occurs. Deception and impersonation in ballads and plays become conventional attributes of the outlaw persona. Marketed to a broader audience, Robin's character is increasingly submissive to hierarchical authority, and his deceptions are not relevant to contemporary social concerns. In the nineteenth century, Robin is a fun-loving gentleman in fancy dress. Novels and plays portray him as a romantic, conservative, patriotic hero who plays tricks for entertainment. This transformation of Robin Hood is among the most remarkable threads in his legend. | |
| dc.format.extent | 89 pages | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1828/17007 | |
| dc.rights | Available to the World Wide Web | en_US |
| dc.title | Deception and impersonation in the Robin Hood tradition : a comparison of medieval and nineteenth-century approaches | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- AYKROYD_LUCAS_MA_1997_746886.pdf
- Size:
- 2.96 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format