Deception and impersonation in the Robin Hood tradition : a comparison of medieval and nineteenth-century approaches

dc.contributor.authorAykroyd, Lucas Mikael Darcheen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-12T19:31:21Z
dc.date.available2024-08-12T19:31:21Z
dc.date.copyright1997en_US
dc.date.issued1997
dc.degree.departmentDepartment of English
dc.degree.levelMaster of Arts M.A.en
dc.description.abstractHowever, medieval and nineteenth-century approaches to these themes are different. In medieval English ballads, trickery by the outlaw hero and his supporters embodies a subversive attitude toward hierarchical authority, depicted as corrupt and unjust to gratify a plebeian yeoman audience. Acts of deception furnish anti-authoritarian commentary on political, economic, and religious issues. But from 1500 to 1800, a change occurs. Deception and impersonation in ballads and plays become conventional attributes of the outlaw persona. Marketed to a broader audience, Robin's character is increasingly submissive to hierarchical authority, and his deceptions are not relevant to contemporary social concerns. In the nineteenth century, Robin is a fun-loving gentleman in fancy dress. Novels and plays portray him as a romantic, conservative, patriotic hero who plays tricks for entertainment. This transformation of Robin Hood is among the most remarkable threads in his legend.
dc.format.extent89 pages
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1828/17007
dc.rightsAvailable to the World Wide Weben_US
dc.titleDeception and impersonation in the Robin Hood tradition : a comparison of medieval and nineteenth-century approachesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
AYKROYD_LUCAS_MA_1997_746886.pdf
Size:
2.96 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format