Was that part of the story or did I just think so? : age differences, mild cognitive impairment, and intraindividual variability in inferences and story recognition

dc.contributor.authorBielak, Allison Anne Marieen_US
dc.contributor.supervisorHultsch, David F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-04-10T05:58:47Z
dc.date.available2008-04-10T05:58:47Z
dc.date.copyright2004en_US
dc.date.issued2008-04-10T05:58:47Z
dc.degree.departmentDept. of Psychologyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe present study expanded the story recognition and inference literature by investigating age differences within the older age range, differences as a result of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and extending the focus of the investigation into the consistency of responding. 304 older adults completed a story recognition task across five different occasions. Old-old (00) adults and those with more severe MCI showed poorer ability to accurately recognize inferences, and less sensitivity to discriminate between statement types. Intraindividual variability was positively correlated with increasing age and cognitive impairment, and interactions revealed the greatest inconsistency involved the false, rather than inferred statements. The findings support our proposal that participants used two different recognition strategies, and their episodic memory ability defined the efficiency and frequency of use of the strategies. 00 and MCI adults may be less able to recognize that something plausible and consistent with an event may not have actually occurred.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/497
dc.subject.lcshCognition disorders in old ageen_US
dc.titleWas that part of the story or did I just think so? : age differences, mild cognitive impairment, and intraindividual variability in inferences and story recognitionen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
bielak_2004.pdf
Size:
2.77 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format