Auditing genAI reasoning in qualitative analysis: A prompt-level case study
| dc.contributor.author | Baidwan, Deepkhushi | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-04-16T22:31:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-04-16T22:31:36Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.description.abstract | GenAI tools are increasingly used to assist qualitative researchers with tasks like transcript coding and theme generation. However, most evaluations focus only on whether GenAI outputs match human-produced codes, not on how the model arrived at those outputs. This study audits the reasoning process of NotebookLM, a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) tool, across a structured 12-prompt sequence applied to eight interview transcripts on open pedagogy and institutional constraints. The audit logged 20 analytic decisions across two coding pathways (inductive and deductive), tracking triggers, rationale, and consequences at each stage. Four key observations emerged: prompt wording directly shaped coding behavior; supporting evidence was retrieved after coding decisions rather than driving them (a ""provenance gap""); ambiguous passages were automatically resolved without surfacing alternatives; and outputs visually resembled rigorous audit reports without being independently verifiable. The central finding is that GenAI outputs can perform methodological accountability without genuinely providing it, with significant implications for peer review, replication, and research integrity. | |
| dc.description.reviewstatus | Reviewed | |
| dc.description.scholarlevel | Undergraduate | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Jamie Cassels Undergraduate Research Awards (JCURA) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1828/23610 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | University of Victoria | |
| dc.subject | genAI | |
| dc.subject | qualitative coding | |
| dc.subject | thematic analysis | |
| dc.subject | prompt engineering | |
| dc.subject | reasoning audit | |
| dc.subject | research methodology | |
| dc.subject | Jamie Cassels Undergraduate Research Awards (JCURA) | |
| dc.subject.department | Department of Computer Science | |
| dc.title | Auditing genAI reasoning in qualitative analysis: A prompt-level case study | |
| dc.type | Poster |