The Politics of Personification: Anthropomorphism and Agency in Chaucer, Langland, and Lydgate
| dc.contributor.author | Gilbert, Gaelan | |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | Mitchell, J. Allan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-08-24T18:49:52Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-07-17T11:22:06Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015 | en_US |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-08-24 | |
| dc.degree.department | Department of English | |
| dc.degree.level | Doctor of Philosophy Ph.D. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This dissertation attends to the figurative device of personification, or prosopopoeia, in the writings of three late-medieval English authors, Geoffrey Chaucer, William Langland, and John Lydgate. Situating my study between three coordinates -- the lineage of rhetorical anthropomorphism stretching back to Quintilian, the medieval political context that drew on figurative personification, and recent theoretical work in political ecology and philosophical sociology (actor-network theory) -- I argue in the introduction that the redistributions of agency from abstract terms to personified figures performed in prosopopoeia entail an intrinsic politicization; the personifications of non-humans deployed by Chaucer, Langland, and Lydgate hinge on and exploit the anthropomorphic qualities of speech and embodiment, which late-medieval theories of political representation see as essential prerequisites for political agency. The affinities between literary and legal-political discourses are even thicker; more sophisticated instances of personification refract in fictive narrative the part-whole dynamic between unity and multiplicity that undergirds representative government in its negotiation between delegated sovereignty and deliberative conciliarity, or, put differently, between actors and the networks within which their action becomes intelligibly institutional. Prosopopoeia thus emerges in my texts of interest as not only a multifaceted catalyst for democratizing debate about matters of concern to vernacular publics – from female agency to royal reform -- but also as a moving target for imaginatively theorizing -- and experimenting with the limits of -- the ethical imperatives that govern the proper practice of equitable governance: participation, answerability, reconciliation, common profit. In the discursive culture of late-medieval England, literary prosopopoeia animates simulations of non-human polities for heuristic, humanistic purposes. | en_US |
| dc.description.proquestcode | 0297 | en_US |
| dc.description.scholarlevel | Graduate | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1828/6507 | |
| dc.language | English | eng |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.rights | Available to the World Wide Web | en_US |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/ | * |
| dc.subject | Medieval | en_US |
| dc.subject | Chaucer | en_US |
| dc.subject | Langland | en_US |
| dc.subject | personification | en_US |
| dc.subject | prosopopoeia | en_US |
| dc.subject | anthropomorphism | en_US |
| dc.subject | agency | en_US |
| dc.subject | Lydgate | en_US |
| dc.title | The Politics of Personification: Anthropomorphism and Agency in Chaucer, Langland, and Lydgate | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |