Improving lineup effectiveness through manipulation of eyewitness judgment strategies
| dc.contributor.author | Mah, Eric Y. | |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | Lindsay, D. Stephen | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-30T03:07:10Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-07-30T03:07:10Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020 | en_US |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-07-29 | |
| dc.degree.department | Department of Psychology | en_US |
| dc.degree.level | Master of Science M.Sc. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Understanding eyewitness lineup judgment processes is critical, both from a theoretical standpoint (to better understand human memory) and from a practical one (to prevent wrongful convictions and criminals walking free). Currently, two influential theories attempt to explain lineup decision making: the theory of eyewitness judgment strategies (Lindsay & Wells, 1985), and the signal detection theory-informed diagnostic-feature-detection hypothesis (Wixted & Mickes, 2014). The theory of eyewitness judgment strategies posits that eyewitnesses can adopt either an absolute judgment strategy (base identification decisions only on their memory for the culprit) or a relative judgment strategy (base identification decision on lineup member comparisons). This theory further predicts that relative judgment strategies lead to an increase in false identifications. Contrast this with the diagnostic-feature-detection hypothesis, which predicts that the lineup member comparisons inherent to relative strategies promote greater accuracy. These two theories have been tested indirectly (i.e., via lineup format manipulations tangentially related to the theory), but there is a lack of direct tests. Across two experiments (Ns = 192, 584), we presented participants with simulated crime videos and corresponding lineups, and manipulated judgment strategy using explicit absolute and relative strategy instructions and a novel rank-order manipulation meant to encourage lineup member comparisons. We found no substantial differences in identifications or overall accuracy as a function of instructed strategy. These results are inconsistent with the theory of eyewitness judgment strategies but provide some support for the diagnostic-feature-detection hypothesis. We discuss implications for both theories and future lineup research. | en_US |
| dc.description.scholarlevel | Graduate | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1828/11968 | |
| dc.language | English | eng |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.rights | Available to the World Wide Web | en_US |
| dc.subject | Memory | en_US |
| dc.subject | Lineups | en_US |
| dc.subject | Eyewitness | en_US |
| dc.subject | Diagnostic feature detection | en_US |
| dc.subject | Signal detection theory | en_US |
| dc.title | Improving lineup effectiveness through manipulation of eyewitness judgment strategies | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |