An evaluation of patient-specific IMRT verification failures

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorCrawford, Jason
dc.contributor.supervisorGagne, Isabelle Marie
dc.contributor.supervisorJirasek, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-10T23:59:06Z
dc.date.available2010-09-10T23:59:06Z
dc.date.copyright2010en
dc.date.issued2010-09-10T23:59:06Z
dc.degree.departmentDepartment of Physics and Astronomy
dc.degree.levelMaster of Science M.Sc.en
dc.description.abstractAt the BC Cancer Agency (BCCA), Vancouver Island Centre (VIC), the clinical verification of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) treatment plans involves comparing Portal Image (PI) -based three-dimensionally reconstructed (EPIDose) dose distributions to planned doses calculated using the Pencil Beam Convolution (PBC) algorithm. Discrepancies surpassing established action levels constitute failure. Since 2007, the failure rate of IMRT verification process had been increasing, reaching as high as 18.5% in 2009. A retrospective evaluation of clinical IMRT verification failures was conducted to identify causes and possible resolutions. Thirty clinical verification failures were identified. An equipment malfunction was discovered and subsequently repaired, and several failures were resolved in the process. Statistical uncertainty in measurement outcome was small in comparison to action levels and not considered significant to the production of failures. Still, over 50% of the redelivered plans were shown to consistently fail. A subgroup of consistent verification plans were compared to ion chamber point dose measurements. Relative to ion chamber measurements, EPIDose underestimated the dose while the dose calculation algorithm (PBC, Eclipse version 8.1.18) overestimated the same point dose. Comparisons of individual fields demonstrated that none were identifiably problematic; dose discrepancies were the result of minor but accumulating dose differences. Consistent verification failures were recalculated using two advanced dose calculation engines (the Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm and Monte Carlo). In general, verification metrics improved, and all failures were resolved. Three distinct indices of fluence modulation (or complexity) were shown to correlate with verification metrics. This indicated that deficiencies in both the leaf motion calculator and the PBC (Eclipse version 8.1.18) had likely contributed to the production of failures. In conclusion, clinical verification failures were resolved retrospectively by replacing faulty equipment and using more advanced methods of planned dose calculation, supporting the efficacy and continued use of PI-based three dimensional dose reconstruction for IMRT verification.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/3041
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsAvailable to the World Wide Weben
dc.subjectIMRTen
dc.subjectEPIDen
dc.subjectverificationen
dc.subjectPortal image dose reconstructionen
dc.subjectMonte Carloen
dc.subjectFluence modulationen
dc.subjectintensity modulated radiation therapyen
dc.subjection chamberen
dc.subject.lcshUVic Subject Index::Sciences and Engineering::Physics::Radiationen
dc.subject.lcshUVic Subject Index::Sciences and Engineering::Physicsen
dc.subject.lcshUVic Subject Index::Sciences and Engineering::Health Sciences::Oncologyen
dc.titleAn evaluation of patient-specific IMRT verification failuresen
dc.typeThesisen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JasonCrawford-MScThesis.pdf
Size:
1.74 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.83 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETD)
 
University of Victoria Libraries

We acknowledge and respect the Lək̓ʷəŋən (Songhees and Esquimalt) Peoples on whose territory the university stands, and the Lək̓ʷəŋən and W̱SÁNEĆ Peoples whose historical relationships with the land continue to this day.