Mammal responses to human footprint vary with spatial extent but not with spatial grain

dc.contributor.authorToews, Mary
dc.contributor.authorJuanes, Francis
dc.contributor.authorBurton, A. Cole
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-07T20:02:00Z
dc.date.available2018-08-07T20:02:00Z
dc.date.copyright2017en_US
dc.date.issued2017-03
dc.description.abstractEcological patterns and processes can vary with scale, causing uncertainty when applying small-scale or single-scale studies to regional or global management decisions. Conducting research at large extents and across multiple scales can require additional time and effort, but may prove necessary if it uncovers novel patterns or processes. Knowing the degree to which patterns vary between spatial extents and grains can provide insight into the importance of considering scale, particularly in applied research. Across multiple spatial scales, we evaluated variation in the strength and direction of large mammal responses to human footprint, a measure of human infrastructure (e.g., roads, buildings) and landscape change (e.g., agriculture, forestry). We focused on the response of five boreal mammals: gray wolf (Cams lupus), Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis), coyote (Cams latrans), white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), and moose (Alces alces). Firstly, we asked how responses measured at the regional extent of the boreal forest of Alberta (approximately 400,000 km(2)) compared to those measured at a nested subregional extent (40,000 km(2)) and to those reported in previous studies conducted at smaller spatial extents (median 2400 km(2), mean 46,993 km(2)). Secondly, we tested whether responses differed across three spatial grains of measurement (250 m, 1500 m, or 5000 m radii) at the regional extent. Using the Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute's snowtrack survey data (2001-2013) and human footprint map, we created a set of generalized linear mixed-effects models for each species, which related relative abundance to individual and cumulative effects of human footprint and compared these using an information theoretic approach. We found variation across spatial extents in both direction and strength of estimated mammal responses to human footprint, suggesting that some patterns are scale-dependent. This reinforces the need for regional studies to complement those conducted at smaller extents in order to fully understand, and thus manage for, the impacts of human footprint on mammalian biodiversity. By contrast, we found little variation in direction and strength of responses across spatial grains, indicating that analyses across multiple grain sizes may be of less importance than those conducted across multiple spatial extents.en_US
dc.description.reviewstatusRevieweden_US
dc.description.scholarlevelFacultyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to acknowledge Alberta Innovates-Technology Futures and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for providing the funding to support this research. Furthermore, they would like to thank the ABMI for providing the data for this work, as well as support and assistance in processing large GIS layers (Dr. Branislav Hricko) and in identifying and clarifying data issues (Dr. Shawn Morrison).en_US
dc.identifier.citationToews, M.; Juanes, F.; & Burton, A.C. (2017). Mammal responses to human footprint vary with spatial extent but not with spatial grain. Ecosphere, 8(3), article e01735. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1735en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1735
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/9876
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEcosphereen_US
dc.subjectboreal foresten_US
dc.subjecthuman footprinten_US
dc.subjectlandscape managementen_US
dc.subjectlarge mammalsen_US
dc.subjectrelative abundanceen_US
dc.subjectspatial extenten_US
dc.subjectspatial grainen_US
dc.subjectspatial scaleen_US
dc.titleMammal responses to human footprint vary with spatial extent but not with spatial grainen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
toews_mary_ecosphere_2017.pdf
Size:
3.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: