Direct and indirect measurement of physical activity in older adults: a systematic review of the literature

dc.contributor.authorKowalski, Kristina
dc.contributor.authorRhodes, Ryan E.
dc.contributor.authorNaylor, Patti-Jean
dc.contributor.authorTuokko, Holly
dc.contributor.authorMacDonald, Stuart
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-27T22:39:09Z
dc.date.available2013-09-27T22:39:09Z
dc.date.copyright2012en_US
dc.date.issued2012-12-18
dc.descriptionBioMed Centralen_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background: Due to physiological and cognitive changes that occur with aging, accurate physical activity (PA) measurement in older adults represents a unique challenge. The primary purpose of this study was to systematically review measures of PA and their use and appropriateness with older adults. A secondary aim was to determine the level of agreement between PA measures in older adults. Methods: Literature was identified through electronic databases. Studies were eligible if they examined the correlation and/or agreement between at least 2 measures, either indirect and/or direct, of PA in older adults (> 65 years of age). Results: Thirty-six studies met eligibility criteria. The indirect and direct measures of PA across the studies differed widely in their ability to address the key dimensions (i.e., frequency, intensity, time, type) of PA in older adults. The average correlation between indirect and direct measures was moderate (r=0.38). The correlation between indirect and other indirect measures (r=0.29) was weak, while correlations between direct measures with other direct measures were high (real world: r= 0.84; controlled settings: r=0.92). Agreement was strongest between direct PA measures with other direct measures in both real world and laboratory settings. While a clear trend regarding the agreement for mean differences between other PA measures (i.e., direct with indirect, indirect with indirect) did not emerge, there were only a limited number of studies that reported comparable units. Conclusions: Despite the lack of a clear trend regarding the agreement between PA measures in older adults, the findings underscore the importance of valid, accurate and reliable measurement. To advance this field, researchers will need to approach the assessment of PA in older adults in a more standardized way (i.e., consistent reporting of results, consensus over cut-points and epoch lengths, using appropriate validation tools). Until then researchers should be cautious when choosing measures for PA that are appropriate for their research questions and when comparing PA levels across various studies.en_US
dc.description.reviewstatusRevieweden_US
dc.description.scholarlevelFacultyen_US
dc.identifier.citationKowalski, K., Rhodes, R., Naylor, P., Tuokko, H., & MacDonald, S. (2012). Direct and indirect measurement of physical activity in older adults: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 148en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ijbnpa.org/content/9/1/148
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-148
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/4974
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.titleDirect and indirect measurement of physical activity in older adults: a systematic review of the literatureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kowalski_Kristina_IntJBehavNutrPhysAct_2012.pdf
Size:
383.23 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Kowalski_Kristina_IntJBehavNutrPhysAct_2012.pdf
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.74 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: