Testing and recommending methods for fitting size spectra to data

dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Andrew M.
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, James P. W.
dc.contributor.authorPlank, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorBaum, Julia K.
dc.contributor.authorBlanchard, Julia L.
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-05T18:20:38Z
dc.date.available2018-07-05T18:20:38Z
dc.date.copyright2017en_US
dc.date.issued2017-01
dc.description.abstractThe size spectrum of an ecological community characterizes how a property, such as abundance or biomass, varies with body size. Size spectra are often used as ecosystem indicators of marine systems. They have been fitted to data from various sources, including groundfish trawl surveys, visual surveys of fish in kelp forests and coral reefs, sediment samples of benthic invertebrates and satellite remote sensing of chlorophyll. Over the past decades, several methods have been used to fit size spectra to data. We document eight such methods, demonstrating their commonalities and differences. Seven methods use linear regression (of which six require binning of data), while the eighth uses maximum likelihood estimation. We test the accuracy of the methods on simulated data. We demonstrate that estimated size-spectrum slopes are not always comparable between the seven regression-based methods because such methods are not estimating the same parameter. We find that four of the eight tested methods can sometimes give reasonably accurate estimates of the exponent of the individual size distribution (which is related to the slope of the size spectrum). However, sensitivity analyses find that maximum likelihood estimation is the only method that is consistently accurate, and the only one that yields reliable confidence intervals for the exponent. We therefore recommend the use of maximum likelihood estimation when fitting size spectra. To facilitate this, we provide documented R code for fitting and plotting results. This should provide consistency in future studies and improve the quality of any resulting advice to ecosystem managers. In particular, the calculation of reliable confidence intervals will allow proper consideration of uncertainty when making management decisions.en_US
dc.description.reviewstatusRevieweden_US
dc.description.scholarlevelFacultyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFor useful discussions, we thank Finlay Scott, Jennifer Boldt, Carrie Holt, Jean-Baptiste Lecomte, Brooke Davis and Rowan Haigh. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments that have improved this work. This project arose from a sabbatical visit by M.J.P. to A.M.E.; JR and JKB acknowledge support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and J.L.B. was supported by the UK's Natural Environment Research Council and Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (grant number NE/L003279/1, Marine Ecosystems Research Programme).en_US
dc.identifier.citationEdwards, A. M.; Robinson, J. P. W.; Plank, M. J.; Baum, J. K.; & Blanchard, J. L. (2017). Testing and recommending methods for fitting size spectra to data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 8(1), 57-67.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12641
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/9601
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMethods in Ecology and Evolutionen_US
dc.subjectabundance size spectrum
dc.subjectbiomass size spectrum
dc.subjectbounded power-law distribution
dc.subjectecosystem approach to fisheries
dc.subjectecosystem indicators
dc.subjectindividual size distribution
dc.subjecttruncated Pareto distribution
dc.subject.departmentDepartment of Biology
dc.titleTesting and recommending methods for fitting size spectra to dataen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
edwards_andrew_methodsecolevol_2017.pdf
Size:
521.49 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: