Using collaborative logic analysis evaluation to test the program theory of an intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment for youth with pain-related disability

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorHurtubise, Karen
dc.contributor.authorBrousselle, Astrid
dc.contributor.authorCamden, Chantal
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-13T07:52:48Z
dc.date.available2021-02-13T07:52:48Z
dc.date.copyright2020en_US
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractIntensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT) involves multiple stakeholders. Mapping the program components to its anticipated outcomes (ie, its theory) can be difficult and requires stakeholder engagement. Evidence is lacking, however, on how best to engage them. Logic analysis, a theory-based evaluation, that tests the coherence of a program theory using scientific evidence and experiential knowledge may hold some promise. Its use is rare in pediatric pain interventions, and few methodological details are available. This article provides a description of a collaborative logic analysis methodology used to test the theoretical plausibility of an IIPT designed for youth with pain-related disability. A 3-step direct logic analysis process was used. A 13-member expert panel, composed of clinicians, teachers, managers, youth with pain-related disability, and their parents, were engaged in each step. First, a logic model was constructed through document analysis, expert panel surveys, and focusgroup discussions. Then, a scoping review, focused on pediatric self-management, building self-efficacy, and fostering participation, helped create a conceptual framework. An examination of the logic model against the conceptual framework by the expert panel followed, and recommendations were formulated. Overall, the collaborative logic analysis process helped raiseawareness of clinicians’ assumptions about the program causal mechanisms, identified program components most valued by youth and their parents, recognized the program features supported by scientific and experiential knowledge, detected gaps, and highlighted emerging trends. In addition to providing a consumer-focused program evaluation option, collaborative logic analysis methodology holds promise as a strategy to engage stakeholders and to translate pediatric pain rehabilitation evaluation research knowledge to key stakeholders.en_US
dc.description.reviewstatusRevieweden_US
dc.description.scholarlevelFacultyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWe would like to thank all members of the expert panel who were so willingly sharing their opinions and expertise with us. The first author was also supported by the Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship, by the Pain in Child Health (PICH) and the Canadian Child Health Clinician Scientist Programs.en_US
dc.identifier.citationHurtubise, K., Brousselle, A., & Camden, C. (2020). Using collaborative logic analysis evaluation to test the program theory of an intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment for youth with pain-related disability. Paediatric & Neonatal Pain, 2(4), 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12018.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/12681
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPaediatric & Neonatal Painen_US
dc.subjectinterdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program
dc.subjectintervention theory
dc.subjectlogic analysis
dc.subjectlogic model
dc.subjectpediatric chronic pain
dc.subjecttheory-based evaluation
dc.subject.departmentSchool of Public Administration
dc.titleUsing collaborative logic analysis evaluation to test the program theory of an intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment for youth with pain-related disabilityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hurtubise_Karen_PaediatrNeonatalPain_2020.pdf
Size:
1.71 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Faculty and Staff Publications
 
University of Victoria Libraries

We acknowledge and respect the Lək̓ʷəŋən (Songhees and Esquimalt) Peoples on whose territory the university stands, and the Lək̓ʷəŋən and W̱SÁNEĆ Peoples whose historical relationships with the land continue to this day.