Non-Sewered Sanitation Systems’ Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Balancing Sustainable Development Goal Tradeoffs to End Open Defecation

dc.contributor.authorShaw, Kelsey
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, Chris
dc.contributor.authorDorea, Caetano C.
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-01T20:06:23Z
dc.date.available2021-11-01T20:06:23Z
dc.date.copyright2021en_US
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractDischarge of excreta into the environment and the use of decentralized sanitation technologies, such as septic tanks, pit latrines and ecological sanitation variants (i.e., container-based sanitation), contribute to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions but have remained poorly quantified. The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the impacts that meeting Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6.2 (i.e., ending open defecation by 2030) would have on SDG 13 (i.e., combatting climate impacts). The current Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change GHG estimation methodology was used as the basis for calculations in this analysis, augmented with improved emission factors from collected data sets for all types of on-site sanitation infrastructure. Specifically, this assessment focused on the three different service levels of sanitation (i.e., improved, unimproved and no service) as defined by UNICEF and WHO as they pertain to three Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. This analysis considered the 100-year global warming potential values in carbon dioxide equivalents of methane and nitrous oxide that can be emitted for each scenario and decentralized sanitation technology. Ultimately, six scenarios were developed for various combinations of pathways and sanitation technologies. There was significant variability between the scenarios, with results ranging from 68 Tg CO2eq/year to 7 TgCO2eq/year. The main contributors of GHG emissions in each scenario were demonstrated to be septic tank systems and pit latrines, although in scenarios that utilized improved emission factors (EFs) these emissions were significantly reduced compared with those using only standard IPCC EFs. This analysis demonstrated that using improved EFs reduced estimated GHG emissions within each SSP scenario by 53% on average. The results indicate that achieving SDG sanitation targets will ultimately increase GHG emissions from the current state but with a relatively small impact on total anthropogenic emissions. There is a need for the continued improvement and collection of field-based emission estimations to refine coarse scale emissions models as well as a better characterization of relevant biodegradation mechanisms in popular forms of on-site sanitation systems. An increase in the understanding of sanitation and climate change linkages among stakeholders will ultimately lead to a better inclusion of sanitation, and other basic human rights, in climate action goals.en_US
dc.description.reviewstatusRevieweden_US
dc.description.scholarlevelFacultyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded through a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada, NSERC) Canadian Graduate Scholarships-Masters (CGS-M).en_US
dc.identifier.citationShaw, K., Kennedy, C., & Dorea, C. C. (2021). Non-sewered sanitation systems’ global greenhouse gas emissions: Balancing sustainable development goal tradeoffs to end open defecation. sustainability, 13(11884), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111884en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su132111884
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/13484
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publishersustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectopen defecation
dc.subjecton-site
dc.subjectpit latrine
dc.subjectseptic tank
dc.subjectGreenhouse Gas Emission Analysis
dc.subjectdecentralized sanitation systems
dc.subjectsustainable development goals
dc.subject.departmentDepartment of Civil Engineering
dc.titleNon-Sewered Sanitation Systems’ Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Balancing Sustainable Development Goal Tradeoffs to End Open Defecationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Shaw_Kelsey_sustainability_2021.pdf
Size:
10.94 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: