The structure of the duty of beneficence
Date
2003
Authors
Lambeth, Simon Alexander
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
In this thesis I explore structural issues related to the duty of beneficence. I consider consequentialist and Kantian candidates for the principle of beneficence. My discussion of the consequentialist options is grounded in the work of Liam B. Murphy. Through analyzing Murphy's work, I clarify the most important objections that can be leveled against principles of beneficence. On the basis of those objections I reject two consequentialist principles of beneficence, and two interpretations of the Kantian principle of beneficence.
I offer my own principle of beneficence - the 'moderate principle of beneficence' - which is motivated in part by the Kantian idea of a fundamental respect for rational agency. One crucial facet of the moderate principle is the 'duty of edification'. Despite its importance, this duty has received little attention in philosophical literature, and in moral practice. I close my thesis with a discussion of that duty.