Implementation and scale-up of physical activity and behavioural nutrition interventions: An evaluation roadmap

dc.contributor.authorMcKay, Heather
dc.contributor.authorNaylor, Patti-Jean
dc.contributor.authorLau, Erica
dc.contributor.authorGray, Samantha M.
dc.contributor.authorWolfenden, Luke
dc.contributor.authorMilat, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorBauman, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorRace, Douglas
dc.contributor.authorNettlefold, Lindsay
dc.contributor.authorSims-Gould, Joanie
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-04T23:15:09Z
dc.date.available2024-03-04T23:15:09Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractBackground: Interventions that work must be effectively delivered at scale to achieve population level benefits. Researchers must choose among a vast array of implementation frameworks (> 60) that guide design and evaluation of implementation and scale-up processes. Therefore, we sought to recommend conceptual frameworks that can be used to design, inform, and evaluate implementation of physical activity (PA) and nutrition interventions at different stages of the program life cycle. We also sought to recommend a minimum data set of implementation outcome and determinant variables (indicators) as well as measures and tools deemed most relevant for PA and nutrition researchers. Methods: We adopted a five-round modified Delphi methodology. For rounds 1, 2, and 3 we administered online surveys to PA and nutrition implementation scientists to generate a rank order list of most commonly used; i) implementation and scale-up frameworks, ii) implementation indicators, and iii) implementation and scale-up measures and tools. Measures and tools were excluded after round 2 as input from participants was very limited. For rounds 4 and 5, we conducted two in-person meetings with an expert group to create a shortlist of implementation and scale-up frameworks, identify a minimum data set of indicators and to discuss application and relevance of frameworks and indicators to the field of PA and nutrition. Results: The two most commonly referenced implementation frameworks were the Framework for Effective Implementation and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. We provide the 25 most highly ranked implementation indicators reported by those who participated in rounds 1–3 of the survey. From these, the expert group created a recommended minimum data set of implementation determinants (n = 10) and implementation outcomes (n = 5) and reconciled differences in commonly used terms and definitions. Conclusions: Researchers are confronted with myriad options when conducting implementation and scale-up evaluations. Thus, we identified and prioritized a list of frameworks and a minimum data set of indicators that have potential to improve the quality and consistency of evaluating implementation and scale-up of PA and nutrition interventions. Advancing our science is predicated upon increased efforts to develop a common ‘language’ and adaptable measures and tools.
dc.description.reviewstatusReviewed
dc.description.scholarlevelFaculty
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Meeting, Planning and Dissemination Grant (ID 392349). Dr. Sims-Gould is supported by a CIHR New Investigator Award and a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Scholar Award. These funding bodies had no role in study design, collection, or analysis/interpretation of data; they also had no role in manuscript writing.
dc.identifier.citationMcKay, H., Naylor, P., Lau, E. Y., Gray, S. M., Wolfenden, L., Milat, A., Bauman, A., Race, D., Nettlefold, L., & Sims‐Gould, J. (2019). Implementation and scale-up of physical activity and behavioural nutrition interventions: An evaluation roadmap. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0868-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0868-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1828/16042
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.departmentSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education
dc.titleImplementation and scale-up of physical activity and behavioural nutrition interventions: An evaluation roadmap
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
McKay_Heather_IntJBehavNutrPhysAct_2019.pdf
Size:
1.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: