Experimental manipulation of affective judgments about physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of adults

dc.contributor.authorRhodes, Ryan E.
dc.contributor.authorGray, Samantha
dc.contributor.authorHusband, Cassandra
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-18T03:31:27Z
dc.date.available2023-09-18T03:31:27Z
dc.date.copyright2019en_US
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the current effectiveness of physical activity (PA) interventions to change affective judgements (AJ) and subsequent behaviour and explore potential moderators. Eligible studies were published in a peer-reviewed English journal and included an experimental design in the PA domain with a measure of AJ as the dependent variable, among adults (>17 years). Literature searches concluded in July 2017 using 11 common databases, with additional hand searching conducted in February 2018. The search yielded 32 independent studies. Random-effects meta-analysis showed positive changes in AJ favouring intervention over control groups, g = 0.43 (95% CI = 0.26-0.60). These changes predicted (β = 0.64) positive changes in PA, g = 0.38 (95% CI = 0.16-0.60), among a sub-sample (k = 14) of studies that also provided behavioural data. Moderator analyses showed the effects were inflated by potential publication bias, participant gender, baseline PA and focus of the intervention. AJ may show change from intervention but larger sample studies are required to obtain a more reliable effect size estimate. Further, few studies have employed behaviour change techniques that would align with the theoretical reasons for changes in AJ, so our evidence for practical intervention content is limited.en_US
dc.description.reviewstatusRevieweden_US
dc.description.scholarlevelFacultyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipRER was supported by a Kennedy Y.H. Wong Distinguished Visiting Professorship from Hong Kong Baptist University during the writing of this paper and is also supported by funds from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, the Canadian Cancer Society, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. SMG is supported by a Fellowship from the University of British Columbia and a Canadian Institutes for Health Research Project Grant. CH is supported by a doctoral scholarship from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research.en_US
dc.identifier.citationRhodes, R. E., Gray, S. M., & Husband, C. (2019). Experimental manipulation of affective judgments about physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of adults. Health psychology review, 13(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2018.1530067en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2018.1530067
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/15379
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHealth Psychology Reviewen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/*
dc.subjectEnjoymenten_US
dc.subjectaffective attitudeen_US
dc.subjectexerciseen_US
dc.subjectinterventionsen_US
dc.subjectintrinsic motivationen_US
dc.titleExperimental manipulation of affective judgments about physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of adultsen_US
dc.typePostprinten_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rhodes_Ryan_HealthPsycholRev_2019.pdf
Size:
3.75 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: