From facts to feelings: Navigating the complexities of COVID-19 restrictions, perceptions, and mental well-being

dc.contributor.authorGregory, Madeline
dc.contributor.authorReeves, Jennifer T. H.
dc.contributor.authorDanyluk, Alexa
dc.contributor.authorLegg, Nicole K.
dc.contributor.authorPhiri, Peter
dc.contributor.authorRathod, Shanaya
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Brianna
dc.contributor.authorPaterson, Theone S. E.
dc.descriptionThe authors would like to thank the rest of our research team for their assistance, including Brooke Welch, Zachary Senay, Reina Stewart, and Jamie-Lee Barden.
dc.description.abstractObjectives of the present study were to 1) examine accuracy of COVID-19 public health restriction knowledge and the impact of information source, 2) assess the effect of perceived level of restriction on perceived infection risk of COVID-19 infection and level of compliance with restrictions, and 3) investigate the relationship between mental health outcomes and perceived as well as actual level of restriction. Canadians (n = 5,051) completed an online survey between December 2020 and March 2021 assessing public health restriction knowledge, accuracy of this knowledge, information sources about COVID-19, perceived infection risk, compliance with restrictions, loneliness, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Approximately half of our sample had accurate knowledge of the restrictions in their region/province, which significantly differed by province. Individuals who perceived restriction levels to be higher than they were, reported significantly greater perceived infection risk, more compliance with restrictions, worse mental health, and greater loneliness. Individuals living under moderate restrictions had better mental health and experienced less loneliness compared to minor, significant and extreme restriction levels. Findings suggest that while restrictions are beneficial for compliance, stronger and clearer restrictions should be coupled with mental health supports to remediate the negative effects of restrictions and uncertainty on mental health and loneliness.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (with partner funding from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research) and by the British Columbia Ministry of Health. NKL is funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. BJT is funded by a Michael Smith Health Research BC Scholar Award. TSEP is funded by a Michael Smith Health Research BC/Lotte & John Hecht Memorial Foundation Scholar Award. The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent the views of any of the sponsoring organizations, agencies, or the Federal or Provincial Governments. None of the aforementioned funding agencies had any role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.
dc.identifier.citationGregory, M. A., Reeves, J. T. H., Danyluk, A., Legg, N. K., Phiri, P., Rathod, S., Turner, B. J., & Paterson, T. S. E. (2024). From facts to feelings: Navigating the complexities of COVID-19 restrictions, perceptions, and mental well-being. Psychiatry Research, 334, 115802.
dc.publisherPsychiatry Research
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.subjectpublic health
dc.titleFrom facts to feelings: Navigating the complexities of COVID-19 restrictions, perceptions, and mental well-being


Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
870.71 KB
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
1.62 KB
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission