Treating posteriorly eroded glenoids with augmented baseplate or bony increased offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a finite element comparison

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKaur, Asees
dc.contributor.authorStudders, Carson
dc.contributor.authorHaugan, Delaney
dc.contributor.authorSaliken, Dave
dc.contributor.authorGiles, Joshua W.
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-24T19:12:01Z
dc.date.available2022-10-24T19:12:01Z
dc.date.copyright2022en_US
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionThe uploaded document is the pre-peer review version.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Augmented reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) implants restore glenohumeral joint alignment in cases of asymmetric glenoid wear. However, no consensus has been reached on whether the use of metallic augmented RSA baseplates and bone graft reconstruction are equivalent in terms of implant fixation and risk of implant loosening. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare two augmented RSA designs by assessing the amount of interfacial micromotion generated under realistic physiological loading. Methods: Finite element analysis (FEA) models of 9 scapulae with Walch-type B2 or B3 glenoid morphology were virtually implanted with both a metallic augmented baseplate (AUG-RSA) and using the angled bony increased offset RSA procedure (BIO-RSA). Simulation of physiological loading was performed on each of the 18 FEA models. The relative tangential and normal micromotion at the implant-to-glenoid interface was compared in each anatomical quadrant. Results: The AUG-RSA and angled BIO-RSA showed similar magnitudes of micromotion in most anatomical quadrants of the glenoid. Within the superior quadrant, AUG-RSA displayed a higher magnitude of mean and maximum tangential micromotion (mean: 16.6 ± 2.4 µm, p<0.000; max: 35.1 ± 5.3 µm, p<0.000). The proportion of the posterior quadrant experiencing greater than 50 microns of micromotion was also statistically greater with AUG-RSA (5.8 ± 2.5 %, p=0.047). Conclusion: Due to its statistically greater micromotions and portions of contact exceeding the accepted 50 micron threshold, the AUG-RSA may be more likely to have inhibited bone on-growth. However, the clinical importance of these differences remains unclear.en_US
dc.description.reviewstatusUnrevieweden_US
dc.description.scholarlevelFacultyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada: RGPIN-2018-03894 Vancouver Island Health Authority: GNT-34592 Michael Smith Health Research BC: SCH-2021-1562en_US
dc.identifier.citationKaur, Asees, Studders, Carson, Haugan, Delaney, Saliken, David, & Giles, Joshua W. (2022). Treating posteriorly eroded glenoids with augmented baseplate or bony increased offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a finite element comparison, Seminars in Arthroplasty: JSES. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sart.2022.08.003.en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1053/j.sart.2022.08.003
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/14304
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSeminars in Arthroplasty: JSESen_US
dc.subjectInstitute on Aging and Lifelong Health
dc.subjectreverse shoulder arthroplasty
dc.subjectglenoid erosion
dc.subjectfinite element analysis
dc.subjectaugmented baseplate
dc.subjectbone grafting
dc.subjectInstitute on Aging and Lifelong Health
dc.subject.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineering
dc.titleTreating posteriorly eroded glenoids with augmented baseplate or bony increased offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a finite element comparisonen_US
dc.typePreprinten_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Aug vs BIO-RSA v5 - No Title Page vPRE-REVIEW1.pdf
Size:
356.62 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article without tables and figures
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Faculty and Staff Publications
 
University of Victoria Libraries

We acknowledge and respect the Lək̓ʷəŋən (Songhees and Esquimalt) Peoples on whose territory the university stands, and the Lək̓ʷəŋən and W̱SÁNEĆ Peoples whose historical relationships with the land continue to this day.