Conserving the cultural landscape in the city of Victoria: artist live-in studios ... or not?
| dc.contributor.author | Niwa, Louine | |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | McCann, L. D. | |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | Segger, Martin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-17T19:10:30Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-17T19:10:30Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2003 | |
| dc.description.abstract | City of Victoria municipal policies permitting artist live-in studio developments can potentially protect valuable cultural landscapes downtown early in the 21" century, but they do not. Pertinent policies include the heritage Tax Incentive Program (TIP), live-work and work-live zoning regulations. A Chinatown cultural landscape investigation and surveys (Dragon Alley, Shoal Point) show that gentrification threatens artists. Different styles of urban development in post-industrial Paris, London, and New York are analyzed using a political/planning framework subsequently applied to the City of Victoria. A case study doing institutional ethnography explicates the social relations of a typical low-income artist searching for a live-in studio downtown using a text-work sequencing map and textual analysis. Findings show artists are excluded from ruling relations dominating the policymaking process. Recommendations for policies that encourage development of appropriate, affordable artist live-in studio are transferable to other low-income groups with special architectural needs, such as the elderly and disabled. | |
| dc.description.scholarlevel | Graduate | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1828/22863 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.rights | Available to the World Wide Web | |
| dc.subject.department | Department of Art History and Visual Studies | |
| dc.title | Conserving the cultural landscape in the city of Victoria: artist live-in studios ... or not? | |
| dc.type | Thesis |