JBI systematic review protocol of text/opinions on how to best collect race-based data in healthcare contexts
| dc.contributor.author | Quan, Cindy | |
| dc.contributor.author | Clark, Nancy | |
| dc.contributor.author | Costigan, Catherine L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Murphy, Jill | |
| dc.contributor.author | Li, Michael | |
| dc.contributor.author | David, Anita | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ganesan, Soma | |
| dc.contributor.author | Guzder, Jaswant | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cross, Barbara | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-10T15:53:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-10-10T15:53:28Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Racialized population groups have worse health outcomes across the world compared with non-racialized populations. Evidence suggests that collecting race-based data should be done to mitigate racism as a barrier to health equity, and to amplify community voices, promote transparency, accountability, and shared governance of data. However, limited evidence exists on the best ways to collect race- based data in healthcare contexts. This systematic review aims to synthesize opinions and texts on the best practices for collecting race- based data in healthcare contexts. Methods and Analyses We will use the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) method for synthesizing text and opinions. JBI is a global leader in evidence-based healthcare and provides guidelines for systematic reviews. The search strategy will locate both published and unpublished papers in English in CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2023, as well as unpublished studies and grey literature of relevant government and research websites using Google and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement methodology for systematic reviews of text and opinion will be applied, including screening and appraisal of the evidence by two independent reviewers and data extraction using JBI’s Narrative, Opinion, Text, Assessment, Review Instrument. This JBI systematic review of opinion and text will address gaps in knowledge about the best ways to collect race- based data in healthcare. Improvements in race-based data collection, may be related to structural policies that address racism in healthcare. Community participation may also be used to increase knowledge about collecting race- based data. | |
| dc.description.reviewstatus | Reviewed | |
| dc.description.scholarlevel | Faculty | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | The authors declare mentorship and funding support from the University of Victoria (UVic) Centre for Evidence-Informed Nursing and Healthcare (CEiNHC): A JBI Centre of Excellence CEiNHC and the University of Victoria's Internal Research Grant. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Quan, C., Clark, N., Costigan, C. L., Murphy, J., Li, M., David, A., Ganesan, S., Guzder, J., & Cross, B. (2023). JBI systematic review protocol of text/opinions on how to best collect race-based data in healthcare contexts. BMJ Open, 13(5), e069753. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069753 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069753 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1828/20506 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | BMJ Open | |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject.department | Department of Psychology | |
| dc.subject.department | School of Nursing | |
| dc.title | JBI systematic review protocol of text/opinions on how to best collect race-based data in healthcare contexts | |
| dc.type | Article |