Shield or Shackles: The Pitfalls of Stronger Dispute Resolution Provisions in Insurance Legislation
dc.contributor.author | Adjin-Tettey, Elizabeth | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-01T20:30:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-01T20:30:38Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016 | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2016-04-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | The dispute resolution mechanism for resolving claims-related disputes in jurisdictions like Alberta, British Columbia and Manitoba replaces the appraisal process still in other Canadian jurisdictions. The DR process reflects the growing trend of encouraging parties to use non-judicial mechanisms for fast and cost efficient resolution of disputes. While the DR process can improve access to justice, the current system is premised on formal equality and not sufficiently attentive to the inherently unequal insurer-insured relationship. The informal, privatized system also reflects the growing culture of delegalization of disputes in commercial relationships, and undermines the consumer protection rationale of insurance regulation. | en_US |
dc.description.reviewstatus | Reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.scholarlevel | Faculty | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Adjin-Tettey, “Shield or Shackles: The Pitfalls of Stronger Dispute Resolution Provisions in Insurance Legislation” (2016) 93:3 Can Bar Rev 721. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1828/12721 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Canadian Bar Foundation | en_US |
dc.subject.department | Faculty of Law | |
dc.title | Shield or Shackles: The Pitfalls of Stronger Dispute Resolution Provisions in Insurance Legislation | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Tettey-Adjin_Elizabeth_Can Bar Rev_2016 .pdf
- Size:
- 335.06 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 2 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: