Shield or Shackles: The Pitfalls of Stronger Dispute Resolution Provisions in Insurance Legislation

dc.contributor.authorAdjin-Tettey, Elizabeth
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-01T20:30:38Z
dc.date.available2021-03-01T20:30:38Z
dc.date.copyright2016en_US
dc.date.issued2016-04-01
dc.description.abstractThe dispute resolution mechanism for resolving claims-related disputes in jurisdictions like Alberta, British Columbia and Manitoba replaces the appraisal process still in other Canadian jurisdictions. The DR process reflects the growing trend of encouraging parties to use non-judicial mechanisms for fast and cost efficient resolution of disputes. While the DR process can improve access to justice, the current system is premised on formal equality and not sufficiently attentive to the inherently unequal insurer-insured relationship. The informal, privatized system also reflects the growing culture of delegalization of disputes in commercial relationships, and undermines the consumer protection rationale of insurance regulation.en_US
dc.description.reviewstatusRevieweden_US
dc.description.scholarlevelFacultyen_US
dc.identifier.citationAdjin-Tettey, “Shield or Shackles: The Pitfalls of Stronger Dispute Resolution Provisions in Insurance Legislation” (2016) 93:3 Can Bar Rev 721.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/12721
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCanadian Bar Foundationen_US
dc.subject.departmentFaculty of Law
dc.titleShield or Shackles: The Pitfalls of Stronger Dispute Resolution Provisions in Insurance Legislationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Tettey-Adjin_Elizabeth_Can Bar Rev_2016 .pdf
Size:
335.06 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: