Reconceptualizing and improving member participation in large cooperatives: Insights from deliberative democracy and deliberative mini-publics

dc.contributor.authorPek, Simon
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-22T17:03:47Z
dc.date.available2023-12-22T17:03:47Z
dc.date.copyright2023en_US
dc.date.issued2023
dc.descriptionI express my gratitude to my handling editor, Hélène Delacour, and the two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and developmental engagement with this paper. I would also like to acknowledge the helpful feedback and suggestions offered by Tom Malleson and Morshed Mannan, as well as the research assistance undertaken by Joshua Smith.en_US
dc.description.abstractMember control is a central cooperative value that depends on members having sufficient opportunities to participate in decision-making. Most members of large cooperatives participate in decision-making through non-candidacy participation, which entails responsibilities including electing and monitoring their elected representatives and ratifying resolutions and reports. Non-candidacy participation is crucial to ensure that collective decisions and the conduct of representatives are aligned with the interests of the broader membership. However, prior research points to concerns about the level and quality of non-candidacy participation. In this essay, I draw on research on deliberative democracy to propose a novel solution to address these concerns. I begin by disentangling two commonly conflated forms of non-candidacy participation: aggregative and deliberative. I then argue that large cooperatives could improve both forms of participation through the targeted use of deliberative mini-publics. In doing so, I contribute to research on large cooperatives by advancing a novel solution to improving non-candidacy participation and cooperative governance more broadly, articulating a more fine-grained conception of participation to inform future research, and identifying a novel way of conceptualizing and enacting expertise in these organizations.en_US
dc.description.reviewstatusRevieweden_US
dc.description.scholarlevelFacultyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research benefited from funding from the University of Victoria President’s Chair award (no grant number).en_US
dc.identifier.citationPek, S. (2023). Reconceptualizing and improving member participation in large cooperatives: Insights from deliberative democracy and deliberative mini-publics. M@n@gement, 26(4), 68-82. https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.2023.8478en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.2023.8478
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/15758
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherM@n@gementen_US
dc.subjectCooperativesen_US
dc.subjectCooperative governanceen_US
dc.subjectDeliberative democracyen_US
dc.subjectDeliberative mini-publicsen_US
dc.subject.departmentPeter B. Gustavson School of Business
dc.titleReconceptualizing and improving member participation in large cooperatives: Insights from deliberative democracy and deliberative mini-publicsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
pek_simon_M@n@gement_2023.pdf
Size:
9.18 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: