Inter-laboratory evaluation of instrument platforms and experimental workflows for quantitative accuracy and reproducibility assessment

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPercy, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorTamura-Wells, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorAlbar, Juan Pablo
dc.contributor.authorAloria, Kerman
dc.contributor.authorAmirkhani, Ardeshir
dc.contributor.authorAraujo, Gabriel D.T.
dc.contributor.authorArizmendi, Jesus M.
dc.contributor.authorBlanco, Francisco J.
dc.contributor.authorCanals, Francesc
dc.contributor.authorCho, Jin-Young
dc.contributor.authorColomé-Calls, Núria
dc.contributor.authorCorrales, Fernando J.
dc.contributor.authorDomont, Gilberto
dc.contributor.authorEspadas, Guadalupe
dc.contributor.authorFernandez-Puente, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorGil, Concha
dc.contributor.authorHaynes, Paul A.
dc.contributor.authorHernáez, Maria Luisa
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jin Young
dc.contributor.authorKopylov, Arthur
dc.contributor.authorMarcilla, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorMcKay, Mathew J.
dc.contributor.authorMirzaei, Mehdi
dc.contributor.authorMolloy, Mark P.
dc.contributor.authorOhlund, Leanne B.
dc.contributor.authorPaik, Young-Ki
dc.contributor.authorParadela, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorRaftery, Mark
dc.contributor.authorSabidó, Eduard
dc.contributor.authorSleno, Lekha
dc.contributor.authorWilffert, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorWolters, Justina C.
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Jong Shin
dc.contributor.authorZgoda, Victor
dc.contributor.authorParker, Carol E.
dc.contributor.authorBorchers, Christoph H.
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-14T18:22:33Z
dc.date.available2018-05-14T18:22:33Z
dc.date.copyright2015en_US
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractThe reproducibility of plasma protein quantitation between laboratories and between instrument types was examined in a large-scale international study involving 16 laboratories and 19 LC–MS/MS platforms, using two kits designed to evaluate instrument performance and one kit designed to evaluate the entire bottom-up workflow. There was little effect of instrument type on the quality of the results, demonstrating the robustness of LC/MRM-MS with isotopically labeled standards. Technician skill was a factor, as errors in sample preparation and sub-optimal LC–MS performance were evident. This highlights the importance of proper training and routine quality control before quantitation is done on patient samples.en_US
dc.description.reviewstatusRevieweden_US
dc.description.scholarlevelFacultyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe UVic-Genome BC Proteomics Centre would like to thank Genome Canada and Genome British Columbia for STIC funding and support, as well as Western Economic Diversification of Canada for instrumentation support. All laboratories from Spain are members of ProteoRed (Plataforma de Recursos Biomoleculares y Bioinformáticos) and are supported by grant PT13/0001 funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER). FC wishes to acknowledge support from Grant PRB2 (IPT13/0001 - ISCIII-SGEFI/FEDER). GD wishes to acknowledge support from grants FAPERJ E26-110.138/2013, FAPERJ E-26/111.697/2013, and FAPERJ E-26/0010.1582/2014. AK and VZ state that the Russian portion of the work was done in the framework of the State Academies Fundamental Research Program (2013-2020). Reynaldo Interior (Hospital for Sick Children; Toronto, ON, Canada), Jay Gambee (AAA Service Laboratory; Damascus, OR, USA), and David Chen (University of British Columbia; Vancouver, BC, Canada) are recognized for characterizing the 43 SIS peptides. PAH wishes to thank Ardeshir Amirkhani of the Australian Proteome Analysis Facility, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia for assistance with sample preparation and data analysis.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPercy, A.J., Tamura-Wells, J., Albar,J.P., Aloria, K., Amirkhani, A., Araujo, G. … Borchers, C.H. (2015). Inter-laboratory evaluation of instrument platforms and experimental workflows for quantitative accuracy and reproducibility assessment. EuPA Open Proteomics, 8, 6-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euprot.2015.06.001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euprot.2015.06.001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/9363
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEuPA Open Proteomicsen_US
dc.subjectAccuracy
dc.subjectHuman plasma
dc.subjectQuality control
dc.subjectQuantitative proteomics
dc.subjectReproducibility
dc.subjectWorkflow validation
dc.subjectUVic Genome BC Proteomics Centre
dc.subject.departmentDepartment of Microbiology and Biochemistry
dc.subject.departmentDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology
dc.titleInter-laboratory evaluation of instrument platforms and experimental workflows for quantitative accuracy and reproducibility assessmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Borchers_Christoph_EuPAOpenProt_2015.pdf
Size:
1.87 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Faculty and Staff Publications
 
University of Victoria Libraries

We acknowledge and respect the Lək̓ʷəŋən (Songhees and Esquimalt) Peoples on whose territory the university stands, and the Lək̓ʷəŋən and W̱SÁNEĆ Peoples whose historical relationships with the land continue to this day.