Evaluating anthropogenic threats to endangered killer whales to inform effective recovery plans

dc.contributor.authorLacy, Robert C.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Rob
dc.contributor.authorAshe, Erin
dc.contributor.authorBalcomb III, Kenneth C.
dc.contributor.authorBrent, Lauren J. N.
dc.contributor.authorClark, Christopher W.
dc.contributor.authorCroft, Darren P.
dc.contributor.authorGiles, Deborah A.
dc.contributor.authorMacDuffee, Misty
dc.contributor.authorPaquet, Paul C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-06T15:44:31Z
dc.date.available2019-02-06T15:44:31Z
dc.date.copyright2017en_US
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding cumulative effects of multiple threats is key to guiding effective management to conserve endangered species. The critically endangered, Southern Resident killer whale population of the northeastern Pacific Ocean provides a data-rich case to explore anthropogenic threats on population viability. Primary threats include: limitation of preferred prey, Chinook salmon; anthropogenic noise and disturbance, which reduce foraging efficiency; and high levels of stored contaminants, including PCBs. We constructed a population viability analysis to explore possible demographic trajectories and the relative importance of anthropogenic stressors. The population is fragile, with no growth projected under current conditions, and decline expected if new or increased threats are imposed. Improvements in fecundity and calf survival are needed to reach a conservation objective of 2.3% annual population growth. Prey limitation is the most important factor affecting population growth. However, to meet recovery targets through prey management alone, Chinook abundance would have to be sustained near the highest levels since the 1970s. The most optimistic mitigation of noise and contaminants would make the difference between a declining and increasing population, but would be insufficient to reach recovery targets. Reducing acoustic disturbance by 50% combined with increasing Chinook by 15% would allow the population to reach 2.3% growth.en_US
dc.description.reviewstatusRevieweden_US
dc.description.scholarlevelFacultyen_US
dc.identifier.citationLacy, R. C.; Williams, R.; Ashe, E.; Balcomb III, K. C.; Brent, L. J. N.; Clark, C. W.; … & Paquet, P. C. Evaluating anthropogenic threats to endangered killer whales to inform effective recovery plans. Scientific Reports, 7, article 14119. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14471-0en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14471-0
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1828/10589
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherScientific Reportsen_US
dc.titleEvaluating anthropogenic threats to endangered killer whales to inform effective recovery plansen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
lacy_robert_scirep-uk_2017.pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: