Adolecent wilderness therapy: The relationship of client outcomes to reasons for referral, motivation for change, and clinical measures
| dc.contributor.author | Harper, Nevin J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dobud, Will | |
| dc.contributor.author | Magnuson, Doug | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-29T19:15:48Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-04-29T19:15:48Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.description | The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Victoria (protocol #18-169, 03.05.2018) for studies involving humans. Archival and anonymized data was accessed through the Outdoor Behavioral Healthcare Research Centre and provided to the research team with no identifying details of clients. The authors do not have permission to share data. Data inquiries should be directed to Outdoor Behavioral Healthcare Research Center. | |
| dc.description.abstract | Outdoor behavioral healthcare is a specific model and industry utilizing wilderness therapy (WT), a residential treatment approach comprised of outdoor travel and living for youth experiencing mental health, substance use, and behavioral concerns. We present data from 6417 participants about reasons for referral, admission, and discharge scores from the Youth-Outcome Questionnaire (Y-OQ), youth interest and commitment to treatment, reliable change scores, and the relationship between these variables. One-third of youth entered WT with sub-clinical scores, varying levels of client motivation and voluntariness in relation to clinical outcomes, a diverse range of presenting problems without clear indication of specialized treatment planning, and differing responses to treatment by referral reason. Identifying those not responding to WT and those at risk of deterioration from the time of admission requires further investigation to improve client outcomes for this treatment modality. Recommendations include placing increased importance on accurate and thorough screening and assessment, utilizing baseline and routine outcome monitoring, reducing coercion, and considering specialized intervention. | |
| dc.description.reviewstatus | Reviewed | |
| dc.description.scholarlevel | Faculty | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Harper, N. J., Dobud, W. W., & Magnuson, D. (2024). Adolescent wilderness therapy: The relationship of client outcomes to reasons for referral, motivation for change, and clinical measures. Youth, 4(1), 382–394. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth4010027 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.3390/youth4010027 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1828/16420 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Youth | |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject.department | School of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education | |
| dc.subject.department | Department of Educational Psychology and Leadership Studies | |
| dc.title | Adolecent wilderness therapy: The relationship of client outcomes to reasons for referral, motivation for change, and clinical measures | |
| dc.type | Article |